Door Guardrail with Internal Support Rod for Compact Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door guardrails have an overall size that cannot be further reduced, leading to high packaging and transportation costs.

Innovation Solution

A door guardrail design without exposed support rods, featuring a fabric winding tube, a handlebar, a mesh fabric, a spring device for automatic retraction, and a lock device to control the fabric length, all housed within a compact shell and base.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the support rod is exposed on the exterior of the door guardrail, then the structural strength and stability are improved, but the overall size increases leading to higher packaging and transportation costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidoverall size
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support rod is nested inside the fabric winding tube, with the fabric wound around the support rod. This nesting arrangement allows the support rod to provide structural strength while being contained within the tube, reducing the overall exterior dimensions and eliminating exposed support rods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The support rod is repositioned from an external longitudinal element to an internal element along the longitudinal axis of the fabric winding tube. This dimensional repositioning maintains the support function while consolidating the structure within the tube's volume, reducing packaging footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the support rod is placed inside the fabric winding tube, then the overall size is reduced, but the structural stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall sizeVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The support rod is nested within the fabric winding tube with the mesh fabric wound around it, creating a concentric nested structure. This arrangement ensures the support rod remains internally positioned while maintaining structural stability through the layered construction of tube-fabric-support rod assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The support rod, fabric winding tube, and mesh fabric are merged into an integrated assembly where the support rod serves as the central core, the fabric is wound around it, and the tube encloses both. This merging creates a unified structure that maintains stability while minimizing overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Volume of moving object

If the door guardrail components are compacted to reduce size, then packaging and transportation costs decrease, but the complexity of the locking mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage sizeVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism uses a dynamic swing rod that can pivot between locked and unlocked positions, controlled by spring forces. This dynamic design allows compact storage while maintaining functionality through mechanical motion rather than complex multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded swing rod automatically returns to the locked position after fabric extension, and the tooth portion automatically engages with the swing rod's protrusion. This self-service locking mechanism reduces complexity by eliminating the need for manual resetting or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design allows for strict control of the storage size of the door guardrail, effectively reducing packaging and transportation costs while maintaining functionality.

Implementation Method 1

a spring device allowing the mesh fabric to retract automatically after being pulled out is disposed around the support rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the mesh fabric pushed out is kept in a tensioned state under the action of the force of a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

a second return spring is arranged on a side face perpendicular to the swing rod, and the swing rod is in snap fit with the tooth portion under the action of the second return spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12312860B1Door guardrail without exposed support rods
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 GUANGZHOU PRODIGY DAILY PRODN CO LTD
  • US12312860B1 patent drawing
  • US12312860B1 patent drawing
  • US12312860B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A door guardrail without exposed support rods, comprising a fabric winding tube and a handlebar arranged on an outer side of the fabric winding tube, a mesh fabric being arranged between the fabric winding tube and the handlebar, a support rod is arranged in the fabric winding tube, a spring device allowing the mesh fabric to retract automatically after being pulled out is disposed around the support rod, a lock device used for controlling a length of the mesh fabric pulled out is arranged at an end of the support rod. The support rod is arranged in the fabric winding tube, and the spring device is disposed around the support rod to allow the mesh fabric to retract automatically after being pulled out, such that the storage size of the door guardrail can be strictly controlled, thus effectively controlling packaging and transportation costs.