Interpolable Spot Placement Refinement for Radiation Dose Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiation treatment planning systems for spot scanning struggle with optimizing spot placements that conform to the target volume while minimizing exposure to healthy tissue, achieving uniform dose distribution, and reducing treatment time, as varying spot positions during optimization complicates the process.

Innovation Solution

A method involving normalization of spot dose distributions and recursive refinement of spot arrangements in a hierarchical data structure, such as an octree, to ensure similarity criteria are met, allowing for efficient interpolation and optimization of spot placements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If spot positions are fixed in a predetermined pattern for each energy layer, then the treatment planning process is simpler and faster, but the ability to achieve sharp penumbra and uniform dose distribution is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment planning process simplicityVSAvoiddose distribution uniformity and penumbra sharpness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The target volume is divided into multiple energy layers, with spot patterns generated independently for each layer. This segmentation allows the system to maintain computational efficiency while achieving precise dose distribution through layered optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different spot spacing and patterns are applied to different regions within each energy layer based on local dose requirements. Heterogeneous regions receive finer spot spacing while homogeneous regions use coarser spacing, optimizing both precision and computational efficiency locally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If spot spacing is reduced to improve dose uniformity and penumbra, then dose distribution quality improves, but treatment time increases due to more spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose distribution uniformityVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Spot spacing is optimized locally rather than uniformly across the entire target volume. Regions requiring higher precision (heterogeneous areas, edges) use finer spot spacing, while homogeneous central regions use coarser spacing, reducing total spot count while maintaining dose uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies fine spot spacing only where necessary to achieve dose uniformity and sharp penumbra, rather than uniformly across all regions. This partial application of fine spacing reduces treatment time while maintaining critical dose distribution quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If spot patterns are optimized for each energy layer independently, then lateral penumbra and dose conformity improve, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral penumbra and dose conformityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization problem is segmented into independent sub-problems for each energy layer. This allows parallel processing and reduces computational complexity while maintaining the ability to achieve sharp penumbra through layer-specific optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Spot patterns are pre-calculated and stored for each energy layer before treatment delivery. This preliminary optimization reduces computational complexity during actual treatment while maintaining precise dose conformity through pre-planned spot arrangements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4427803B1Radiation treatment planning systems and methods with interpolable spot placements and dose distributions
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
  • EP4427803B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4427803B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4427803B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An initial, relatively coarse arrangement (500) of spots (501-505; 521-525) in a target volume (510) and a respective dose distribution per spot are accessed from memory or determined. If the dose distributions of neighboring spots do not satisfy a similarity criterion, then a new set of spots with finer spacing is determined for the regions that include dissimilar spots (e.g., spots are added between the dissimilar spots), and spot dose distributions are determined for the new spot arrangement (600). The process is repeated until the similarity criterion is satisfied for all or a threshold number of spots or until a minimum spot spacing is reached. The final arrangement (700) of spots (751-754) and dose distributions for the spots can be stored. During subsequent optimization of a treatment plan based on the final arrangement of spots, a dose distribution for a point that is between the spots can be determined by interpolating the dose distributions of nearby spots.