Interrupt Arbitration for Multiprocessor Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multiprocessor computing systems, efficiently allocating interrupts to processor cores is challenging due to the need for rapid response and minimizing disruption to higher-priority tasks, especially in environments with frequent interrupts and complex computing tasks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an interrupt arbitration system that queries current task priorities across processor cores and assigns interrupts to idle or lowest-priority task processor cores, using an arbitrated interrupt controller and arbiter to communicate and schedule interrupt responses effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If interrupts are allocated to processor cores using traditional methods, then interrupt service can be provided, but interrupt response latency increases and system performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt response latencyVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic interrupt allocation by continuously monitoring the priority of tasks currently executing on each processor core. The arbitrated interrupt controller queries task priorities in real-time and dynamically selects the most appropriate processor core for each interrupt based on current system state, rather than using static allocation methods. This dynamic approach minimizes interrupt response latency while maintaining system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the arbitrated interrupt controller continuously queries processor cores about their current task priorities and uses this information to make informed interrupt allocation decisions. The feedback loop ensures that interrupt allocation adapts to changing system conditions, optimizing both response time and overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If interrupts are allocated to processor cores running high-priority tasks, then resource utilization improves, but disruption to critical tasks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidtask execution integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by evaluating the specific priority level of tasks on each individual processor core and making interrupt allocation decisions based on local task characteristics rather than uniform allocation. The arbitrated interrupt controller queries each core's current task priority and allocates interrupts to cores where the impact on task execution integrity is minimal, thus maintaining both resource utilization and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts interrupt allocation based on real-time task priority information. When a processor core is running a high-priority task, the system dynamically redirects interrupts to alternative cores, thereby protecting critical task execution while still achieving effective resource utilization across the multiprocessor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If complex arbitration logic is implemented to optimize interrupt allocation, then interrupt handling efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt handling efficiencyVSAvoidarbitration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an arbitrated interrupt controller as an intermediary component that manages the complex arbitration logic separately from the processor cores. This mediator handles the querying of task priorities and the decision-making process for interrupt allocation, thereby improving interrupt handling efficiency while containing the complexity in a dedicated control unit rather than distributing it across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The arbitration system is segmented into distinct functional components: the arbitrated interrupt controller that manages arbitration logic, and the processor cores that execute tasks. This segmentation allows the complex arbitration logic to be isolated in a dedicated controller, improving overall system organization and making the complexity manageable while maintaining high interrupt handling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2241979B1Interrupt arbitration for multiprocessors
Publication Date: 2011.10.26 EMPIRE TECH DEV LLC
  • EP2241979B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2241979B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2241979B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Technologies are generally described herein for handling interrupts within a multiprocessor computing system. Upon receiving an interrupt at the multiprocessor computing system, a priority level associated with an interrupt handler for the interrupt can be determined. Current task priority levels can he queried from one or more processors of the multiprocessor computing system. One of the processors can be assigned to execute the interrupt handler in response to the processor having a lowest current task priority level. Interrupt arbitration can schedule and communicate interrupt responses among processor cores in a multiprocessor computing system. Arbitration can query information about current task or thread priorities from a set of processor cores upon receiving an interrupt, The processor core that is currently idle or running the lowest priority task may be selected to service the interrupt.