Interrupt Controller for Dynamic Irrigation Water Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing irrigation systems lack the ability to dynamically adjust water supply based on real-time soil and weather conditions, leading to inefficiencies, potential damage, and water waste.

Innovation Solution

An interrupt controller that receives data from wireless sensors to modify or interrupt control signals to irrigation devices, optimizing water supply by responding to conditions such as soil moisture, weather, and system anomalies, and allowing for remote monitoring and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If programmable irrigation controllers are used to schedule watering for multiple zones, then irrigation timing can be controlled, but the system cannot dynamically adjust to real-time soil and weather conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an interrupt controller as an intermediary device between the main programmable irrigation controller and the irrigation valves. This interrupt controller receives control signals from the main controller, monitors sensor data from soil moisture and weather sensors, and intelligently interrupts or modifies control signals based on real-time conditions. This intermediary approach enables dynamic adaptation without requiring complete system replacement, thus improving adaptability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor soil moisture levels and weather conditions, and this information is fed back to the interrupt controller. The interrupt controller uses this feedback to dynamically adjust irrigation control signals, enabling the system to respond to real-time conditions. This feedback mechanism bridges the gap between static scheduling and dynamic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If continuous monitoring of soil and weather conditions is implemented, then water waste can be reduced, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater wasteVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of implementing continuous monitoring across the entire irrigation system, the patent uses an interrupt controller that selectively monitors specific zones based on control signals. The system performs partial monitoring by focusing resources on zones that are currently scheduled for irrigation or showing abnormal conditions, rather than continuously monitoring all zones. This reduces overall system complexity while still achieving water waste reduction through targeted intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The interrupt controller autonomously processes sensor data and makes decisions about interrupting control signals without requiring constant human intervention or complex centralized processing. The system essentially monitors itself and self-regulates irrigation based on sensor feedback, reducing the need for additional complex monitoring infrastructure while still achieving water conservation goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If interrupt controller is added to modify control signals based on sensor data, then water supply optimization is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater supply efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interrupt controller is designed as a multi-functional device that combines several capabilities: receiving control signals from the main controller, monitoring multiple sensor inputs (soil moisture, weather conditions), processing this data, and generating modified control signals to irrigation valves. By consolidating these multiple functions into a single device, the system achieves water supply optimization without proportionally increasing overall system complexity. The universal design allows one component to perform multiple roles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The interrupt controller serves as an intermediary layer between the simple programmable controller and the irrigation execution layer. It adds intelligence and optimization capabilities without requiring complete system replacement. This intermediary approach allows water supply efficiency improvement while managing complexity by building upon existing infrastructure rather than replacing it entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10512227B2Water flow management systems and methods
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 H2O FLOW PRO
  • US10512227B2 patent drawing
  • US10512227B2 patent drawing
  • US10512227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for controlling water flow in a water distribution system (e.g., irrigation system). In an irrigation system, an interrupt controller receives control signals from an irrigation controller and data from sensors disposed in the irrigation system, and modifies operations of components in the irrigation system based on the sensor data. The sensor data is analyzed to determine conditions in the irrigation system. Based on the analysis, the operation of the irrigation system is interrupted or modified to optimize the supply of water. The interruption or modification of the operation of the irrigation system allows detected abnormal conditions to be investigated and corrected.