Intersecting Jets for Reactive Material 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies face challenges in using reactive materials due to their gelation or viscosity changes, which renders them unprintable, and struggle to recreate the heterogeneity of native tissues for bioprinting applications, limiting the fabrication of functional biological structures.

Innovation Solution

The intersecting jets-based printing-then-mixing approach, where reactive materials are ejected as separate droplets that collide and coalesce on a substrate, enabling voxel-resolution mixing and deposition of reactive materials for the fabrication of biological structures, such as neural stem cell spheres and alginate structures, with controlled compositional gradients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If reactive materials are mixed before printing, then the material can be deposited, but the material undergoes gelation or viscosity increase that prevents droplet or filament formation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprintabilityVSAvoidrheological stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The material components are segmented into separate storage reservoirs and only combined at the point of deposition through intersecting jets. This prevents premature gelation while enabling controlled mixing of reactive materials like alginate and calcium chloride at the moment of printing, resolving the contradiction between printability and compositional stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If reactive materials are used, then material functionality is improved, but the materials become unable to form droplets or filaments due to gelation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial functionalityVSAvoiddroplet formation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reactive materials are prepared and stored separately in their printable states before printing. The intersecting jets system pre-positions multiple material streams and only triggers mixing at the precise moment of deposition, allowing reactive materials to maintain their droplet-forming capability until the moment of functional activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional mixing methods are used, then material homogeneity is achieved, but cellular and material heterogeneity cannot be recreated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial homogeneityVSAvoidspatial heterogeneity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The intersecting jets system enables different material compositions to be deposited at different spatial locations with precise control. By varying the activation timing and positioning of multiple jets, the system creates local compositional variations that replicate the heterogeneity of native tissues while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple materials are printed simultaneously, then compositional heterogeneity is achieved, but jet alignment and droplet collision control become complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompositional heterogeneityVSAvoidjet alignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intersecting jets system uses a controlled collision zone as an intermediary space where multiple material jets converge. This mediator zone enables precise control of droplet interactions and material mixing while simplifying the overall system architecture, as the complexity of multi-material coordination is localized to a defined spatial region rather than distributed throughout the entire printing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the fabrication of viable biological structures with well-defined heterogeneity, maintaining cell viability and enabling the creation of complex geometries with improved printability and structural integrity, comparable to traditional bioprinting methods.

Implementation Method 1

reactive materials are ejected as separate droplets that collide and coalesce on a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDroplet collision and coalescence:

Data Source

PatentUS11731343B2Three-dimensional printing of reactive materials using intersecting jets
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US11731343B2 patent drawing
  • US11731343B2 patent drawing
  • US11731343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples of systems and methods are provided for three-dimensional (3D) printing of reactive materials. In one aspect, among others, a system includes a droplet generation assembly comprising a first printhead coupled to a first reservoir of reactive material and a second printhead coupled to a second reservoir of reactive material, the first and second printheads configured to produce jets of reactive material droplets; a jet alignment assembly configured to adjust orientation of the first and second printheads to align the jets of the reactive material droplets for intersection at a collision point; and a motion control assembly configured to adjust positioning of the first and second printheads and a platform configured to position a deposition location at the collision point.