Intersection Navigation Using Turn Signal Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in safely navigating intersections with human-driven vehicles, as human driver behavior is not standardized, making it difficult for autonomous vehicles to predict and respond to human intentions accurately.

Innovation Solution

The use of predictive modeling that combines vehicle motion, turn signals, driver body language, and V2V or V2X information to estimate the intentions of surrounding vehicles, allowing autonomous vehicles to decide when to proceed or wait at intersections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicles use standardized driving rules, then navigation efficiency is improved, but accuracy in predicting human driver behavior deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy of human driver behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its prediction model based on the type of surrounding vehicle. For autonomous vehicles, it applies standardized rule-based predictions for efficient navigation. For human-driven vehicles, it switches to perception-based behavioral analysis to accurately predict non-standardized human driver actions, thus resolving the contradiction between navigation efficiency and prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the prediction parameters based on the target vehicle type. When detecting human-driven vehicles, it activates additional perception parameters (driver body language, turn signals, vehicle motion patterns) that are not needed for standardized autonomous vehicle predictions. This parameter adaptation allows accurate prediction of human behavior while maintaining efficient standardized processing for autonomous vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If autonomous vehicles rely solely on perception data, then system complexity is reduced, but ability to predict human driver intentions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprediction reliability of human driver intentions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary classification layer that first identifies whether a surrounding vehicle is autonomous or human-driven based on perception data. This intermediary step then routes the prediction process to the appropriate model (standardized rules for autonomous vehicles, behavioral analysis for human-driven vehicles), thereby maintaining system simplicity while improving prediction reliability for human drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction system is segmented into two distinct modules: one for standardized autonomous vehicle predictions and another for human driver behavior predictions. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently - the autonomous vehicle module remains simple and rule-based, while the human driver module incorporates complex perception-based behavioral analysis, thus resolving the contradiction between system complexity and prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If autonomous vehicles apply comprehensive safety checks, then safety is improved, but navigation speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidnavigation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies safety checks selectively based on the type of surrounding vehicle. When an autonomous vehicle is detected, standardized safety protocols are applied. When a human-driven vehicle is detected, the system performs additional perception-based safety analysis (driver intent prediction, behavioral pattern recognition) beyond standard checks. This partial application of comprehensive safety measures maintains high safety standards while avoiding unnecessary delays in standardized scenarios, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and navigation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9983591B2Autonomous driving at intersections based on perception data
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9983591B2 patent drawing
  • US9983591B2 patent drawing
  • US9983591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and devices for predicting a driver's intention and future movements of a proximal vehicle, whether an automated vehicle or a human driven vehicle, are disclosed herein. A system for predicting future movements of a vehicle includes an intersection component, a camera system, a boundary component, and a prediction component. The intersection component is configured to determine that a parent vehicle is near an intersection. The camera system is configured to capture an image of the proximal vehicle. The boundary component is configured to identify a sub-portion of the image containing a turn signal indicator on the proximal vehicle. The prediction component is configured to predict future movement of the proximal vehicle through the intersection based on a state of the turn signal indicator.