Interspecific Cherry Rootstock Accelerating Fruit Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rootstocks for cherry trees, such as 'Mazzard' and 'Mahaleb', often result in delayed fruit production and require more time for tree size control, with 'Mazzard' exhibiting a significant dwarfing effect, and lack efficient rooting capabilities compared to 'Atlas' and 'Viking' rootstocks.

Innovation Solution

The development of an interspecific rootstock tree (Prunus salicina×Prunus avium) with rapid rooting ability, compatible with various cherry varieties, allowing for earlier and larger branch growth, and reduced sucker production, achieved through asexual reproduction and selection from proprietary seedling selections '85EG395' and '5.5GK110', which is compatible with 'Craig's Crimson', 'Royal Rainier', and other cherry varieties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If standard rootstocks like 'Mazzard' and 'Mahaleb' are used for cherry trees, then tree size control is achieved, but fruit production is delayed by 2-3 years

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefruit production timeVSAvoidtime to fruit production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the genetic parameters of the rootstock by creating an interspecific hybrid between Prunus salicina (Japanese plum) and Prunus avium (sweet cherry). This genetic parameter change results in a rootstock that accelerates fruit production by 2-3 years compared to traditional rootstocks, directly resolving the time loss contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Shape

If 'Mazzard' rootstock is used, then dwarfing effect for tree size control is achieved, but rooting capability is poor compared to 'Atlas' and 'Viking' rootstocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetree size controlVSAvoidrooting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite genetic structure by hybridizing Prunus salicina and Prunus avium species. This composite rootstock combines the dwarfing characteristics needed for tree size control with enhanced rooting capabilities, simultaneously achieving both shape control and reliable rooting that neither parent species alone provides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If proprietary seedling selections are used for rootstock, then compatibility with various cherry varieties is improved, but asexual reproduction and selection processes become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with cherry varietiesVSAvoidbreeding and propagation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal rootstock that functions compatibly with multiple cherry varieties including Bing, Lapins, and Rainier. This single interspecific hybrid rootstock replaces the need for multiple variety-specific rootstocks, simplifying the overall propagation system while maintaining broad compatibility across different cherry cultivars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUSPP21723P2Interspecific tree named `NEWROOT-1`
Publication Date: 2011.02.22 ZAIGER GARY NEIL
  • USPP21723P2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new and distinct variety of interspecific rootstock tree. Its novelty consist of the following combination of desirable features that are unique in a new rootstock tree when growing cherries (Prunus avium). The new interspecific rootstock was grown on Handford sandy loam soil with Storie Index rating 95, in USDA Hardiness Zone 9, near Modesto, Calif., with standard commercial fruit growing practices, such as pruning, thinning, spraying, irrigation and fertilization. Its novelty consist of the following combination of desirable features:1. Provides earlier production of fruit when growing cherries.2. Reduces the mature cherry tree height compared to the standard cherry rootstock ‘Mahaleb’ (non-patented) or ‘Mazzard’ (non-patented).3. Increase the number of rootstocks available for cherries.