Interspinous Implant with Lateral Retainer for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interspinous implants face challenges in achieving stability and minimizing invasiveness during implantation, often requiring removal of ligaments and large approach paths, which can destabilize the vertebral column and increase surgical complexity.

Innovation Solution

An interspinous implant design featuring a body with wings extending along lateral faces of spinous processes and a retainer inserted from the same lateral face, allowing for unilateral posterior approach without dissection of the supraspinous ligament, minimizing damage and facilitating stable installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lateral wings are used to confer stability to the implant, then stability is improved, but the bulk of the implant increases making implantation more invasive and preventing multi-level surgery

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidbulk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into separate components: a body and a retainer. The body provides stability through its dimensions while the retainer is a separate element that can be inserted through the same lateral face, enabling multi-level surgery without increasing overall bulk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer is designed to be inserted through the same lateral face as the body, utilizing a different dimensional approach (unilateral posterior approach) rather than requiring bilateral access, thus reducing invasiveness while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a large approach path is used for implantation, then ease of implantation is improved, but surgical trauma increases and ligament integrity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implantationVSAvoidsurgical trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant components (body and retainer) are designed to be inserted separately through a limited approach path, avoiding the need for large incisions or extensive dissection of the supraspinous ligament.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer acts as an intermediary element that facilitates stable implantation through a minimally invasive approach, allowing the body to be positioned correctly without requiring extensive surgical exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If ligaments are removed to facilitate implantation, then ease of implantation is improved, but vertebral column stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implantationVSAvoidvertebral column stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is designed to be inserted first through the same lateral face, preparing the path and establishing stability before the body is inserted, eliminating the need for ligament removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The implant design allows self-retention through the retainer body interaction without requiring ligament removal or additional stabilization measures, preserving vertebral column integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9913667B2Interspinous implant and instrument for implanting an interspinous implant
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 LDR MEDICAL SAS
  • US9913667B2 patent drawing
  • US9913667B2 patent drawing
  • US9913667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an interspinous implant (1), intended to be implanted between two adjacent dorsal spines (EI, ES), each including an upper edge (E2), a lower edge (E3) and two opposed lateral faces (E4, E5), wherein the implant (1) includes at least one body (10) with dimensions arranged so as to maintain or restore a distance between the adjacent edges (E2, E3) of the two spinous processes (EI, ES) and including at least two wings (11, 12) extending so that at least a part of each wing (11, 12) lies along at least a part of one lateral face (E4, E5) of one of the two spinous processes (EI, ES) and, additionally, at least one retainer (2, 3, 4, 7, 111, 121, 221, 24, 28, 29, L, 90) for the implant, designed to retain the body (10) of the implant between the two spinous processes and to be inserted from the same lateral face as the body (10).