Interventional MRI Devices With Susceptibility-Differentiated Markers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The limited availability of interventional medical devices suitable for use under MRI hinders the widespread adoption of MRI-guided procedures, leading to increased patient visits, treatment delays, and reduced effectiveness due to the use of multiple imaging modalities and image alignment issues.

Innovation Solution

Development of medical devices with a dual-material construction, featuring a reinforcement member and a passive MRI marker, where the materials have distinct magnetic susceptibilities, allowing clear visualization under MRI without the need for multiple imaging modalities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional interventional devices are used under MRI, then the device structure is simple, but the device is not visible under MRI and requires multiple imaging modalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice visualization under MRIVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates a composite structure with a ferromagnetic reinforcement member (providing structural support) and a paramagnetic marker (enabling MRI visualization). This composite material approach allows the device to simultaneously achieve mechanical strength and MRI visibility without requiring multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The device applies different magnetic properties to different parts: the reinforcement member uses ferromagnetic material with high susceptibility for structural integrity, while the marker uses paramagnetic material with lower susceptibility for MRI visualization. This local differentiation of material properties enables both structural and imaging functions within a single device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If multiple imaging modalities are used for treatment, then comprehensive imaging information is obtained, but patient visits and treatment time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging information completenessVSAvoidpatient visit duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device enables MRI to serve multiple functions simultaneously: it provides both the structural guidance needed for intervention and the imaging contrast necessary for visualization. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate imaging modalities and multiple patient visits, as MRI alone can provide comprehensive imaging information throughout the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If image fusion software is used to merge MRI and ultrasound, then guidance information is provided, but image alignment issues and compression shifting occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage alignment accuracyVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the alignment problem by providing intrinsic MRI-visible markers directly on the device. This eliminates the need for complex image fusion software and post-processing alignment algorithms, as the device itself provides the reference points needed for accurate visualization without requiring software-based image merging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables single-visit procedures with improved accuracy and reduced costs by providing clear visualization and alignment within MRI, enhancing the effectiveness of treatments.

Implementation Method 1

a passive MRI marker attached to the elongate member and formed of a second material having a second magnetic susceptibility that is different than, and preferably greater than, the first magnetic susceptibility

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic susceptibility difference: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20250249212A1Medical devices for interventional MRI and related methods
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 MUFFIN INC
  • US20250249212A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249212A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249212A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to medical devices, methods of performing an interventional medical treatment under MRI, and methods of making a medical device. An example medical device includes an elongate member, a reinforcement member, and a marker. The elongate member has a proximal end, a distal end, and a circumferential wall having an outer surface and an inner surface that defines a lumen. The reinforcement member is disposed within the circumferential wall, extends along a length of the elongate member, is formed of a first material, and has a first susceptibility. The marker is attached to the elongate member, is formed of a second material, and has a second susceptibility that is different from the first susceptibility.