Interview Scheduling Tool Using Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Coordinating and scheduling interviewers for complex interviews is challenging, especially when multiple interviewers and sessions are involved, as it requires manual coordination and can be time-consuming, often necessitating a dedicated coordinator familiar with multiple employees and their job descriptions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based interview-scheduling tool that automates the process by receiving candidate and interviewer availability information, defining interview schedule frameworks with constraints, and using constraint satisfaction problems to generate optimized schedules, allowing for seamless selection and management of interviewers and resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a dedicated recruiting coordinator manually schedules interviews, then the scheduling process can be personalized and adjusted based on employee knowledge, but the process becomes time-consuming and requires significant human effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling processVSAvoidtime to schedule interviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service scheduling by allowing recruiters and candidates to input their own availability and preferences, which the constraint solver then processes automatically. This eliminates the need for manual back-and-forth coordination while maintaining personalized scheduling based on individual constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of coordinator-based scheduling is replaced with an automated computational system using constraint satisfaction algorithms. The system substitutes human coordination efforts with algorithmic processing that automatically finds optimal schedules based on input constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If multiple interviewers are coordinated manually, then the right interviewer can be selected based on skills and availability, but the complexity of coordination increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterviewer selectionVSAvoidcoordination system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination problem is segmented into distinct constraint categories (interviewer availability, candidate availability, skill requirements, room availability) that are independently defined and then processed together by the constraint solver. This modular approach manages complexity by breaking down the overall scheduling task into manageable constraint components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint solver acts as an intermediary that mediates between multiple conflicting constraints from different interviewers and candidates. It processes all constraints simultaneously and finds a solution that satisfies all parties, eliminating the need for manual coordination negotiations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If calendar searches and confirmations are done manually for each interviewer, then scheduling accuracy can be maintained, but the productivity of the recruiting process decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling accuracyVSAvoidrecruiting process speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

All availability constraints and preferences are collected in advance before the scheduling computation begins. The system performs preliminary data gathering and constraint definition, allowing the constraint solver to quickly generate accurate schedules without iterative manual confirmations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual iterative process of checking calendars and confirming availability is replaced with a single computational pass through the constraint satisfaction problem. The system substitutes repeated manual verification with one automated calculation that guarantees constraint satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If last-minute schedule changes are handled manually, then flexibility can be maintained, but the coordinator must repeat the entire scheduling process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule flexibilityVSAvoidtime to reschedule
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to dynamically re-schedule interviews when changes occur. Rather than requiring a complete restart, the constraint solver can efficiently re-process the modified constraints and generate updated schedules, adapting to changes in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains the complete set of constraints and solver configuration in advance, so when changes occur, only the modified constraints need to be updated and re-solved. This preliminary preparation enables rapid rescheduling without repeating the entire process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9117201B2Generating interview schedule results from a set of constraint satisfaction problems
Publication Date: 2015.08.25 HIREVUE
  • US9117201B2 patent drawing
  • US9117201B2 patent drawing
  • US9117201B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Interview scheduling technologies are described. In one method, the interview-scheduling tool presents an interface to receive candidate availability information from a user for possible interview schedules for an interview candidate. The user interface permits the user to define an interview schedule framework that specifies desired criteria for a desired interview schedule for the interview candidate. The desired criteria of the interview schedule framework specify one or more interview sessions. The interview-scheduling tool receives the candidate availability information and the desired criteria and defines a data structure representing the interview schedule framework, wherein the data structure comprises a set of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The interview-scheduling tool presents the interview schedule results that fit the desired interview schedule for selection by the user. The interview schedule results are automatically generated from the set of CSPs by a constraint solver tool and without additional user interaction at the user interface.