Intraoral Sensor Position Detection for Dental Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intraoral x-ray systems often fail to automatically adjust exposure parameters based on the specific teeth or anatomy being imaged, leading to suboptimal image quality and excessive radiation exposure.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that uses receptor holders and magnetic field sensors to identify the type of image being acquired, adjusting exposure parameters such as voltage, current, and exposure time to match the specific anatomy, thereby minimizing radiation exposure while maintaining image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If exposure parameters are manually set by operator, then flexibility in adjustment is maintained, but image quality consistency and radiation dose optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidimage quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies teeth anatomy and selects optimal exposure parameters without operator intervention. The intraoral sensor and processing unit self-determine the imaging requirements and configure the x-ray system accordingly, eliminating manual adjustment while ensuring consistent image quality and optimized radiation dose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes exposure parameters (kVp, mA, exposure time) based on automatic detection of teeth anatomy. Different parameter sets are selected according to the detected tooth type and imaging requirements, allowing optimal parameters to be applied automatically without manual operator input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If exposure parameters are manually adjusted, then adaptation to specific anatomy is possible, but radiation exposure minimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomy-based parameter adjustmentVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from automatic teeth identification to adjust exposure parameters. The intraoral sensor detects anatomical features, the processing unit analyzes this data to determine the optimal exposure settings, and the system applies these settings automatically, ensuring minimal radiation dose while maintaining image quality for each specific anatomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously determines the appropriate radiation dose by automatically identifying the teeth anatomy and selecting pre-programmed exposure parameters optimized for each tooth type, eliminating the need for manual radiation dose assessment and ensuring consistent minimization of harmful radiation exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If automated parameter adjustment is implemented, then image quality consistency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intraoral sensor serves multiple functions: capturing x-ray images and simultaneously detecting teeth anatomy for automatic parameter selection. The processing unit performs both image processing and anatomical analysis, reducing the need for separate dedicated components and managing system complexity through multi-functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pre-programmed exposure parameter sets that represent optimal settings for different tooth types. Instead of calculating parameters in real-time, the system copies from a library of pre-determined parameter configurations based on automatic teeth identification, simplifying the automation process while maintaining consistent image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures consistent and high-quality x-ray images by automatically adjusting exposure parameters based on the specific anatomy, reducing radiation exposure and improving image clarity across a full-mouth series of images.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic field sensor disposed in or on the housing and configured to sense one or more magnetic fields and output magnetic field data based on the one or more magnetic fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS9986964B2Intraoral sensor position detection for full mouth image
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 DENTAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US9986964B2 patent drawing
  • US9986964B2 patent drawing
  • US9986964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for determining characteristics of an intraoral dental imaging sensor. A method includes providing an intraoral dental imaging sensor having a housing and a magnetic field sensor disposed in or on the housing, placing the intraoral dental imaging sensor in a holder, positioning the intraoral dental imaging sensor and at least part of the holder in a mouth of a patient, attaching a reference magnet to the patient, receiving, by an electronic processor, magnetic field data from the magnetic field sensor, determining, by the electronic processor, information including a position of the intraoral dental imaging sensor in the mouth of the patient based at least in part on the magnetic field data, and detecting x-rays by the intraoral dental imaging sensor to produce image data.