Intrathecal Enzyme Delivery via CSF Diffusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current enzyme replacement therapies struggle to effectively deliver therapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier, limiting the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, particularly lysosomal storage disorders, due to the barrier's restrictive nature and lack of effective delivery methods.

Innovation Solution

Intrathecal administration of a replacement enzyme at high concentrations (e.g., greater than 5 mg/ml) into the cerebrospinal fluid, using simple saline or buffer-based formulations, allows for extensive diffusion across brain regions without inducing severe immune responses, enabling efficient CNS delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If intravenous enzyme replacement therapy is administered, then systemic distribution is achieved, but the blood-brain barrier prevents adequate delivery to CNS tissues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme delivery to CNSVSAvoidblood-brain barrier restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as an intermediary medium to deliver the enzyme replacement therapy to the CNS. By injecting the enzyme into the CSF space via lumbar puncture, the therapy bypasses the blood-brain barrier entirely and allows the enzyme to diffuse through the CSF to reach affected brain and spinal cord tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the delivery system by separating the administration route from the systemic circulation. Instead of relying on intravenous delivery through the bloodstream, the enzyme is delivered directly into the CSF space, creating a separate delivery pathway that avoids the blood-brain barrier restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If direct intra-cranial injection is used to bypass the blood-brain barrier, then brain delivery is achieved, but the risk of complications increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme delivery to brainVSAvoidintra-cranial injection complications
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of injecting directly into the brain parenchyma (intra-cranial), the patent inverts the approach by injecting into the sub-arachnoid space (lumbar region) and allowing the enzyme to diffuse through the CSF to reach the brain. This reverses the traditional direct injection approach and eliminates the associated risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The CSF acts as an intermediary that carries the enzyme from the lumbar injection site to the brain and spinal cord tissues, eliminating the need for direct intra-cranial injection and its associated complications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If intrathecal injection is used to deliver enzyme to CSF, then CNS delivery is improved, but the enzyme binds tightly to ependymal lining preventing diffusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme delivery to CNSVSAvoidenzyme diffusion in CSF
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the enzyme formulation by conjugating the enzyme with mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) or other targeting moieties that change its binding characteristics. This parameter change prevents tight binding to the ependymal lining while maintaining the ability to cross the ependymal barrier and reach CNS tissues through the CSF.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If high concentration enzyme is administered intrathecally, then therapeutic effect is improved, but immune response may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme concentration in CSFVSAvoidimmune response
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the enzyme formulation, including concentration, pH, and formulation excipients, to optimize delivery while minimizing immune response. The high concentration is achieved through careful formulation that maintains enzyme stability and reduces immunogenicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a clinically desirable and patient-friendly method for treating CNS diseases by achieving therapeutic enzyme levels in various brain tissues and peripheral organs, effectively addressing the challenges of traditional delivery methods.

Implementation Method 1

the enzyme effectively and extensively diffuses across various surfaces and penetrates various regions across the brain, including deep brain regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP3875107A1Pharmaceutical formulation comprising a replacement enzyme for a lysosomal enzyme for use in treating lysosomal storage disease intrathecally
Publication Date: 2021.09.08 TAKEDA PHARMA CO LTD
  • EP3875107A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3875107A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3875107A1 patent drawingFigure 2C

AI summary

The present invention provides an effective and less invasive approach for direct delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system (CNS). In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods including a step of administering intrathecally to a subject suffering from or susceptible to a lysosomal storage disease associated with reduced level or activity of a lysosomal enzyme, a composition comprising a replacement enzyme for the lysosomal enzyme.