Intravascular Shadow Validation for Accurate Stent Strut Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intravascular imaging technologies face challenges in accurately detecting and validating shadows generated by stent struts and other objects, which can lead to misidentification of features and interfere with diagnostic procedures.

Innovation Solution

The use of locally adaptive thresholds and validation steps to enhance shadow detection, allowing for sensitive detection of faint shadows while reducing false positives, is implemented in intravascular imaging systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional shadow detection methods are used in intravascular images, then detection speed is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately detect faint shadows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshadow detection accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing is divided into distinct stages: initial shadow candidate detection using simple intensity thresholding, followed by separate validation steps that analyze geometric relationships between detected shadows and stent struts. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, improving overall detection accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary shadow detection using computationally simple intensity-based thresholding to identify candidate shadow regions before applying more complex validation algorithms. This preliminary action filters out obvious non-shadows early, reducing the computational burden of subsequent validation steps while maintaining high detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If sensitive detection thresholds are used to find faint shadows, then measurement precision improves, but reliability worsens due to increased false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefaint shadow detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through validation steps that check the geometric and intensity relationships between detected shadow candidates and actual stent struts. Shadows that do not conform to expected geometric patterns or intensity gradients are rejected, providing a feedback mechanism that eliminates false positives while preserving sensitive detection of genuine faint shadows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process acts as an intermediary between initial shadow detection and final shadow confirmation. This intermediary layer analyzes additional features such as shadow shape, intensity distribution, and spatial relationship to stent struts, serving as a filter that reduces false positives without requiring changes to the sensitive detection threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If validation steps are added to reduce false positives, then reliability improves, but productivity deteriorates due to increased processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshadow validation accuracyVSAvoidimage processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Validation operations are segmented and applied selectively to shadow candidates based on their initial detection confidence and characteristics. High-confidence shadows undergo minimal validation, while low-confidence candidates receive more rigorous checking. This segmented approach maintains high reliability for critical cases while preserving processing throughput for obvious detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process applies partial verification to shadow candidates based on their likelihood of being true positives. Rather than applying full validation to all candidates, the system performs validation selectively on shadows that require additional verification, reducing overall processing time while maintaining reliability for uncertain cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3800646B1Detection of and validation of shadows in intravascular images
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 LIGHTLAB IMAGING LLC
  • EP3800646B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3800646B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3800646B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

In part, the disclosure relates to shadow detection and shadow validation relative to data sets obtained from an intravascular imaging data collection session. The methods can use locally adaptive thresholds and scan line level analysis relative to candidate shadow regions to determine a set of candidate shadows for validation or rejection. In one embodiment, the shadows are stent strut shadows, guidewire shadows, side branch shadows or other shadows.