Intrinsically Safe Energy Supply for Explosive Atmospheres

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for process analysis in potentially explosive atmospheres restrict the selection of new or replacement loads due to the requirement for uniform ignition protection types, making it difficult to integrate intrinsically safe devices into pressure-proof encapsulated systems.

Innovation Solution

A device with a pressure-proof housing and intrinsically safe outputs, equipped with an ignition protection module that converts input voltage and current to safe levels, allowing for the connection and use of intrinsically safe loads in potentially explosive environments, while maintaining pressure-proof encapsulation for inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pressure-proof encapsulation is used for all loads and cables, then explosion protection is ensured, but the selection of new loads is severely restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion protectionVSAvoidselection of new loads
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the system into two distinct parts: a pressure-proof encapsulated input interface and an intrinsically safe output interface. This segmentation allows each part to serve its specific function with appropriate protection levels, enabling the system to maintain explosion protection while accepting diverse load types through the intrinsically safe output side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device acts as an intermediary between pressure-proof encapsulated cables and intrinsically safe loads. By positioning itself as a bridge with dual interfaces, it enables connection between otherwise incompatible systems, allowing users to integrate intrinsically safe devices into existing pressure-proof systems without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If uniform ignition protection type is required, then system safety is maintained, but system flexibility and upgrade capability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides universal compatibility by supporting both pressure-proof encapsulated inputs and intrinsically safe outputs within a single unit. This multi-functionality allows the same device to work with various load types and protection categories, enabling system upgrades and replacements without being constrained by uniform protection type requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If pressure-proof encapsulation is used, then existing system compatibility is maintained, but integration of intrinsically safe devices becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compatibilityVSAvoidintegration of new devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies different protection qualities to different parts of its interface: the input side maintains pressure-proof encapsulation for compatibility with existing systems, while the output side provides intrinsically safe characteristics for integration of modern intrinsically safe devices. This local differentiation of protection qualities resolves the conflict between maintaining system stability and enabling device integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the retrofitting or replacement of devices in explosive atmospheres, reduces certification costs, and allows for the use of intrinsically safe loads within pressure-proof systems, enhancing flexibility and safety.

Implementation Method 1

The load is designed in such a way that current, voltage, power and temperature are limited so that the minimum ignition energy of an explosive mixture surrounding the load is not reached

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntrinsic safety:

Implementation Method 2

the pressure-proof encapsulation of a load in a housing that can withstand explosive pressure inside the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure containment:

Data Source

PatentUS11316338B2Device for supplying energy to at least one load in a potentially explosive atmosphere
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 ENDRESS HAUSER CONDUCTA GMBH CO KG
  • US11316338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a device for supplying energy to at least one intrinsically safe load in a potentially explosive area, the device including: a housing with an electrical input and with at least one electrical output, the housing is encapsulated in a pressure-proof manner, the electrical input encapsulated in a pressure-proof manner, and the at least one electrical output being intrinsically safe; an ignition protection module arranged in the housing and electrically connected to the electrical input and to the at least one electrical output, wherein the ignition protection module converts an electrical voltage present at the electrical input into an intrinsically safe electrical voltage and provides it at least one electrical output there, wherein the ignition protection module converts an electrical current present at the electrical input into an intrinsically safe electrical current and provides it at the at least one electrical output there.