Intrusion Sensor Nodes With Local Processing For Barrier Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intrusion detection systems lack decentralized processing capabilities, making it difficult to calibrate sensor sensitivity remotely, integrate multiple detection technologies, and interface with commercial alarm systems, leading to reduced sensitivity, reliability, and increased complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a processing component in each sensor to enable localized data processing, remote calibration, and integration of diverse detection technologies over a single communication line, while allowing interfacing with commercial alarm systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a processing component is incorporated in each sensor, then sensitivity and reliability are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent sensor nodes, each with its own processing component. This segmentation allows localized processing and calibration without affecting other sensors, improving reliability while keeping individual sensor complexity manageable through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing component in each sensor is designed to be universal, capable of performing multiple functions including local data processing, calibration, and communication. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, thereby enhancing reliability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If remote calibration capability is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration easeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each sensor is equipped with its own processing component that enables self-calibration through local algorithms. The sensor can autonomously adjust its sensitivity and detection thresholds without requiring manual intervention or complex external calibration equipment, thereby improving ease of operation while minimizing the addition of external complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The processing component implements feedback mechanisms that allow the sensor to continuously monitor its own performance and automatically adjust calibration parameters. This closed-loop feedback enables remote calibration through software updates or control signals, improving operational ease without requiring physical access or complex calibration hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple detection technologies are integrated over a single communication line, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor integration capabilityVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing component in each sensor is designed with universal interfaces and protocols that enable it to integrate multiple detection technologies (vibration, tension, acoustic, etc.) through a single communication line. The sensor can switch between or combine different sensing modes as needed, improving adaptability while maintaining communication simplicity through standardized data formats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple detection technologies are merged into a unified sensor node with a single communication interface. The processing component consolidates data from various sensors (vibration, tension, acoustic) and transmits them through one communication line, reducing the complexity of the communication infrastructure while enhancing the system's ability to detect diverse intrusion methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances sensitivity, reliability, and immunity to disruptions, while reducing costs and complexity by enabling remote calibration and integration of various sensors and commercial system compatibility.

Implementation Method 1

sensing via the array, of one or more occurrence/s (or in other words—typical phenomena), that takes place when there is an attempted penetration through the physical barrier means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

variations in the tension of the wires, that naturally accompanies cutting, sawing of—or climbing on—the taut stretched wires

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Data Source

PatentUS9135796B2Intrusion detection system and its sensors
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 SABRA DE FENCE TECH
  • US9135796B2 patent drawing
  • US9135796B2 patent drawing
  • US9135796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intrusion detection system, that comprises a multi sensors array deployable along a physical barrier means and linkable to it in a manner that enables sensing various phenomena (one or more), typically take place when an attempted intrusion act occurs through the physical barrier means, and generation of an indication when such a phenomenon is sensed, characterized by that, that at least in one of the sensors there is installed a processing component that belongs and is specifically allocated to the sensor and enables local analyzing of the sensed phenomena within said sensor.