In-Vehicle Speech Recognition Error Correction via Segmented Address Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-vehicle communication systems often misrecognize speech commands, leading to user frustration and poor experience due to the inefficiency of re-inputting commands to correct mistakes, which exceeds the recommended glance time and task completion time guidelines.

Innovation Solution

The system allows users to re-enter only the portion of the destination address most likely to be incorrect, identified by the system's logic, reducing the need for re-inputting the entire address and minimizing user interface navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the user re-inputs the entire speech command to correct misrecognized input, then the system can potentially recognize the correct command, but the user experience deteriorates due to repeated failures and excessive time required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the address input into multiple fields (state, city, street number, street name) and identifies which specific field is misrecognized. Instead of requiring the user to re-input the entire address, the system only requests correction of the problematic segment, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by treating different portions of the address differently based on recognition confidence. Fields with high confidence are preserved, while fields with low confidence are flagged for user correction. This selective approach improves user experience by minimizing re-input requirements while ensuring accurate recognition where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the user re-inputs the entire speech command to fix recognition errors, then the system may achieve correct recognition, but the time required exceeds the recommended glance time and task completion guidelines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand recognition accuracyVSAvoidglance time and task completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the address into discrete fields and identifying only the misrecognized portion, the system reduces the amount of information the user must re-input. This segmentation approach directly reduces task completion time while maintaining reliable recognition of the complete address.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by requesting only the minimal necessary user input to correct the error. Instead of requiring full re-input, the system asks only for the specific fields that were misrecognized, thereby minimizing the time loss while ensuring reliable correction of the command.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system requires multiple re-inputs of speech commands to fix mistakes, then the system can potentially achieve correct recognition, but the complexity of the interaction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress identification accuracyVSAvoidinterface navigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies interface complexity by segmenting the correction process into field-specific corrections rather than requiring navigation through multiple general re-input interfaces. The system presents a simplified interface that targets only the problematic address field, reducing the number of interface elements the user must navigate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by providing context-specific correction interfaces for each address field type (state, city, street). This localized approach reduces overall interface complexity by presenting only the relevant correction options for the specific field that needs correction, rather than displaying the entire address form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9188456B2System and method of fixing mistakes by going back in an electronic device
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9188456B2 patent drawing
  • US9188456B2 patent drawing
  • US9188456B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and computer program product for allowing a user to fix errors in a user input is described. An original user input providing a destination address or a point of interest is received by an in-vehicle computing system. Upon receiving a user input indicating an error in interpreting the original user input, the user is presented with a new query requesting the user to enter a portion of or a category associated with the original input. Once the updated user input providing a portion of the original input is received, the user input is identified and executed based on the original user input entry and the updated user input.