Inventory Audit Prioritization via Uncertainty Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-product retail stores face inefficiencies in inventory checks and audits due to their labor-intensive nature, leading to poor inventory accuracy, lost sales, and suboptimal replenishment orders, as unscheduled audits fail to direct resources to products with the greatest business impact.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using an inventory predictor model to generate inventory confidence scores for products, prioritizing audits based on uncertainty, and triggering restock events or notifications, which balances product uncertainty with business impacts by ranking products based on sales volume, inventory estimates, and audit history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inventory checks and audits are performed on all products, then inventory accuracy is improved, but labor time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory accuracyVSAvoidlabor time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inventory audit process by dividing all products into different priority groups based on their uncertainty levels. Instead of auditing all products uniformly, the system identifies and prioritizes only those products with high inventory uncertainty for manual audit, while low-uncertainty products are monitored through predictive modeling alone. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by maintaining high inventory accuracy through targeted auditing while significantly reducing overall labor time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated predictive modeling that continuously estimates inventory levels and calculates uncertainty metrics for products. The predictive model serves itself by automatically identifying which products require human audit intervention based on their uncertainty levels, eliminating the need for manual assessment of each product and reducing labor time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If unscheduled audits are performed on a selection of products, then labor resources are reduced, but inventory accuracy deteriorates due to inadequate resource direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor resource efficiencyVSAvoidinventory accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating uncertainty metrics for all products before conducting any physical audits. The predictive model预先 identifies which products are most likely to have inventory discrepancies based on historical data, sales patterns, and other relevant factors. This preliminary assessment enables targeted auditing of high-uncertainty products, ensuring that limited labor resources are directed to products that will most benefit from physical verification, thereby maintaining inventory accuracy while improving labor efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of product selection from random or uniform sampling to uncertainty-based prioritization. By transforming the selection criterion from arbitrary to data-driven, the system ensures that audit resources are allocated to products with the greatest need, resolving the contradiction between labor efficiency and inventory accuracy through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If annual audits are conducted, then some inventory verification is achieved, but responsiveness to current inventory issues is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory verificationVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous useful action through ongoing predictive modeling that continuously monitors and updates inventory uncertainty levels for all products. Rather than relying on discrete annual audits, the predictive model operates continuously, automatically identifying products that require immediate audit attention based on current uncertainty levels. This continuous monitoring maintains reliable inventory verification while significantly improving responsiveness to emerging inventory issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the periodic annual audit into a dynamic periodic system where audit frequency and timing are determined by real-time uncertainty levels. Products with high uncertainty trigger immediate or near-term audits, while stable products are monitored between audits. This adaptive periodic action maintains verification reliability while improving speed of response compared to fixed annual schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240362583A1Prioritizing inventory check and aduits for a multi-product retailer
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20240362583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362583A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for prioritizing inventory checks and audits includes receiving a plurality of product identifiers. Each respective product identifier of the plurality of product identifiers is associated with a respective product of a plurality of products. For each respective product identifier of the plurality of product identifiers, the method also includes predicting, using an inventory predictor model, a mixture probability distribution over possible quantities for the associated respective product, and generating, using the mixture probability distribution, a respective inventory confidence score. Here, the respective inventory confidence score indicates a confidence estimation of an actual inventory of the respective associated product. The method further includes selecting, using each respective inventory confidence score for each respective product, a list of candidate products from the plurality of products, the list of candidate products ordering the candidate products based on an uncertainty of the actual inventory of the respective candidate product.