Inventory Control System for Automated Recalled Product Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current product recall processes are inefficient and prone to human error, leading to defective products remaining on the market, potentially causing harm to consumers and being costly due to manual inspections.

Innovation Solution

An inventory control system that uses identification codes (such as UPC codes or RFID tags) to automatically deny the purchase of recalled products by implementing a 'do not sell' rule when the code is scanned, ensuring defective items are not sold through integration with retail and manufacturer communication networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspections are used to check retail establishments for recalled products, then the recall process can be monitored, but human error and lack of manpower cause defective products to remain on the market

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverecall process effectivenessVSAvoiddefective products reaching consumers

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual inspection systems with an automated electronic identification and blocking system. Scanners equipped with recognition software automatically identify recalled products using their identification codes and prevent their sale, eliminating human error and manpower limitations inherent in manual inspection approaches.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service functionality where the retail establishment's own scanning equipment automatically detects and blocks recalled products without requiring external inspector intervention. The scanner system independently performs the recall enforcement function that previously required government or third-party inspectors.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If government teams conduct on-the-ground inspections to ensure recalled product removal, then product safety can be monitored, but the process is costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedefective product removal assuranceVSAvoidtime between recall issuance and inspection

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-programming the scanner with identification codes of recalled products before they reach the retail establishment. When a recalled product is scanned, the system immediately recognizes it and blocks the sale, preventing the need for subsequent inspection and eliminating the time delay between recall issuance and enforcement.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The scanner system operates continuously at the point of sale, providing uninterrupted monitoring of all product transactions. This continuous automated surveillance replaces the intermittent, discrete nature of manual inspections, ensuring that recalled products are blocked at every opportunity without time gaps or human intervention delays.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If manual inspection processes are used to verify recall compliance, then recall enforcement can occur, but the process is costly due to manpower requirements

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverecall compliance verificationVSAvoidcost of manual inspections

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive manual inspection labor with automated scanner technology. The scanning system, once programmed with recall identification codes, automatically performs compliance verification without requiring inspector manpower, thereby eliminating the direct labor costs associated with manual recall enforcement while maintaining or improving verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If human inspectors manually check retail establishments for recalled products, then recall enforcement can occur, but human error causes defective products to be overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverecall enforcement simplicityVSAvoiddefective product identification accuracy

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human inspectors with automated scanning technology that objectively identifies recalled products based on their identification codes. This mechanical/electronic system eliminates human cognitive errors, fatigue, and subjectivity, providing consistent and accurate identification of recalled products while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8181866B2Method and system to improve product recalls

Publication Date: 2012.05.22 BOWLUS MITCHELL D

AI summary

A method and system is provided to deter purchases of recalled products. An inventory control system is provided with an identification code corresponding to a recalled product. The identification code of the recalled product is identified when it is scanned or otherwise determined to be part of a sale at a retail establishment and/or an e-commerce establishment. The purchase of the recalled product corresponding to the identification code identified is automatically denied.