Inventory Pre-staging for In-person Transaction Requests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing in-person transactions at physical locations face inefficiencies due to insufficient inventory availability, leading to delayed or unfulfilled customer demands, and require reactive ordering of new inventory, which wastes resources and time.

Innovation Solution

A system that forecasts customer demands for physical items across multiple locations, allowing pre-staging of orders and specifying transaction details such as amount, subunit combinations, and collection times, while providing authorization and directing customers to locations with available inventory, including alternate locations if needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If physical items are distributed across multiple locations, then customer service coverage is improved, but inventory availability at each location becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidinventory availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by forecasting customer demands before they occur and pre-staging physical items at appropriate locations. The computing system analyzes historical data, current trends, and customer preferences to predict future requests, then proactively transfers items to locations where they will be needed, ensuring availability without requiring large inventories at each site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring actual customer transactions, inventory levels, and demand patterns at each location. This real-time data feeds back into the forecasting model, allowing the system to adjust predictions and pre-staging decisions dynamically, optimizing inventory distribution across the network of locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If inventory is pre-staged at locations based on forecasts, then customer waiting time is reduced, but forecasting accuracy requirements increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer waiting timeVSAvoidforecasting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: it forecasts demand, determines optimal locations for pre-staging, calculates transfer quantities, tracks inventory movements, and provides customer notifications. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing demand forecasting and inventory pre-staging without requiring manual intervention from staff at each location. The computing system autonomously analyzes data, makes decisions about where and how much inventory to transfer, and executes the pre-staging, reducing operational complexity at the physical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If reactive ordering of new inventory is used, then inventory shortages are addressed, but resources and time are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory shortage resolutionVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of reacting to inventory shortages after they occur, the system takes preliminary action by forecasting future demand and pre-staging items before they are needed. This proactive approach prevents stockouts rather than merely responding to them, eliminating the need for urgent reactive ordering and the associated resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the intermediate step of reactive ordering by directly transitioning from demand forecasting to pre-staging inventory. This eliminates the inefficient cycle of depleting inventory, detecting shortages, placing urgent orders, and waiting for delivery, thereby conserving resources and reducing lead times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS9996817B2Managing requests for in-person transactions
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US9996817B2 patent drawing
  • US9996817B2 patent drawing
  • US9996817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, are described that receive, from a device, a request to obtain an amount of physical items from an account, the account defining a total quantity of the physical items able to be obtained from the account, and the account being maintained across multiple locations at which the physical items are stored. The request is transmitted to at least one computer that manages inventory of the physical items for at least one of the multiple locations. Inventory availability information is received from the at least one computer that manages inventory of the physical items, including information regarding availability of the amount of physical items, and availability of a combination of differently-sized subunits of physical items that satisfy the requested amount. The inventory availability information is then transmitted to the device.