Inventory Prediction System for Price Trend Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Businesses often overpay for inventory items due to reactive purchasing practices, leading to operational issues, decreased customer satisfaction, and increased costs, as they tend to buy when inventory is low or prices are unfavorable, and may face unavailability from preferred vendors.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that predicts inventory needs based on past purchases and sales data, analyzes consumption rates and price trends, and provides users with real-time indicators (e.g., 'Buy Now' or 'Buy Later') to optimize purchasing decisions, allowing for strategic inventory management and potential price advantages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If businesses wait until inventory is low or out of stock to purchase items, then they ensure adequate stock availability, but they pay higher prices and lose negotiating power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestock availabilityVSAvoidpurchasing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates predicted inventory levels using historical purchase and sales data to determine the optimal future purchase timing before stock runs out. This allows businesses to purchase inventory in advance during periods of lower demand and better pricing, rather than reacting when stock is depleted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual inventory levels, sales data, and purchase history to refine predictions. By comparing predicted versus actual inventory depletion patterns, the system adjusts future purchase recommendations to optimize both timing and quantity, creating a feedback loop that improves decision accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If businesses purchase inventory reactively when needed, then they avoid stockouts, but they cannot take advantage of favorable price trends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory adequacyVSAvoidpurchasing price
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes historical price data and predicts future price trends to identify optimal purchase windows. By timing purchases based on predicted price decreases rather than reacting to stock levels, businesses can acquire inventory at lower costs while maintaining adequate stock availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts purchase recommendations based on real-time changes in inventory depletion rates, price trends, and sales patterns. This flexible approach allows the optimal purchase timing to adapt to changing conditions rather than following a fixed reactive schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If businesses delay inventory purchases to wait for better prices, then they reduce costs, but they risk vendor unavailability or price increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchasing costVSAvoidvendor availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates the optimal purchase timing by balancing predicted price improvements against the risk of vendor unavailability. By using historical data to predict when prices will be most favorable while ensuring inventory is replenished before stockouts occur, the system identifies the precise window for cost-effective purchasing without compromising availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors vendor inventory status and price changes in real-time, adjusting purchase recommendations based on actual vendor availability and price movements. This feedback mechanism ensures that delayed purchases are made only when vendor availability is confirmed, preventing the risk of unavailability or price increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If businesses monitor inventory continuously to optimize purchasing, then they improve decision accuracy, but they increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory prediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects and analyzes inventory, sales, and price data without requiring manual intervention. By using automated data aggregation from existing business systems and applying predictive algorithms, the system achieves high measurement precision while minimizing the operational complexity burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions including inventory tracking, sales analysis, price monitoring, and purchase recommendation generation into a single unified platform. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate tools and manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9898713B1Methods systems and computer program products for monitoring inventory and prices
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 INTUIT INC
  • US9898713B1 patent drawing
  • US9898713B1 patent drawing
  • US9898713B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer program products for an inventory monitor are disclosed. In one or more embodiments, the disclosed method involves predicting a number of inventory items on a future date based at least in part upon a number of the inventory items on the current date and a rate of consumption of the inventory items, which is determined based on prior sales of the inventory items. The method also involves determining a price trend of the inventory items. In addition, the method involves determining whether to purchase the inventory items on the current date based at least in part upon the predicted number of inventory items, a rate of consumption of the inventory items, and a price trend of the inventory items. Further, the method involves displaying to the user an indicator of whether to purchase the inventory items on the current date or on a later date.