Inventory Redistribution via Buffer Utilization Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for distributing inventory across multiple fulfillment centers oversimplify the task by providing equal shares, failing to account for differences in capacity, customer preferences, and handling capabilities, leading to inventory imbalances and increased shipping times due to fluctuating consumer demand.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that retrieves inventory data from multiple sources, determines buffer levels across destinations, identifies high and low utilization centers, and redistributes inventory by transferring quantities from low utilization centers to high utilization centers with common attributes, and further distinguishes between short-term and long-term inventory tranches for targeted redistribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If equal shares of inventory are provided to each fulfillment center, then distribution simplicity is improved, but inventory balance and customer service quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution simplicityVSAvoidinventory balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing inventory distribution to each fulfillment center's specific characteristics. The system calculates optimal inventory allocation based on individual center capacities, regional demand patterns, and historical performance metrics, rather than applying uniform distribution. This ensures each location receives appropriate inventory levels matched to its local conditions, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and inventory balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by continuously monitoring and adjusting inventory distribution in real-time. It tracks fluctuating consumer demand, updates buffer calculations dynamically, and redistributes inventory as conditions change. This dynamic approach maintains inventory balance adaptively, preventing the deterioration that would occur with static equal-share distribution while managing complexity through automated real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If inventory is staged across multiple fulfillment centers, then shipping speed is improved, but distribution complexity and monitoring difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping speedVSAvoiddistribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a centralized control system that performs multiple functions: it monitors inventory levels across all fulfillment centers, calculates optimal buffer levels, determines redistribution quantities, and manages the entire distribution network. This multi-functional system handles the complexity of multi-center staging centrally, enabling fast shipping through distributed inventory while consolidating management complexity in a single automated platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring inventory levels, buffer utilization, and demand patterns at each fulfillment center. This real-time feedback enables the system to detect imbalances and automatically trigger redistribution operations, maintaining optimal shipping speed across the network while managing distribution complexity through closed-loop control rather than manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If traditional buffer calculation methods are used, then calculation simplicity is improved, but accuracy in predicting inventory needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation simplicityVSAvoidbuffer accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by incorporating multiple dynamic variables into buffer calculations, including historical demand data, seasonal patterns, regional preferences, fulfillment center capacity factors, and real-time sales velocity. These additional parameters enhance prediction accuracy significantly compared to simple methods, while the automated calculation system manages the increased complexity, maintaining ease of operation through algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements preliminary action by calculating optimal buffer levels in advance based on predicted demand patterns and center-specific factors. It proactively determines redistribution quantities before inventory imbalances occur, using historical data and forecasting algorithms. This advance planning improves buffer accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity, as the system automates the complex preliminary calculations and executes them before demand fluctuations create problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If inventory redistribution is performed frequently, then inventory balance is improved, but operational costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory balanceVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing inventory redistribution only when and where needed, rather than frequently across all centers. The system monitors buffer levels continuously and triggers redistribution only when imbalances exceed predetermined thresholds, focusing operations on specific high-utilization and low-utilization center pairs. This selective approach maintains inventory balance effectively while minimizing unnecessary transfer operations and associated time costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated monitoring and decision-making algorithms that independently identify imbalances and execute redistribution without manual intervention. The automated system continuously assesses inventory levels, calculates optimal transfer quantities, and manages the redistribution process, reducing both the frequency of human-operated transfers and the time consumption associated with manual inventory management while maintaining reliable balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11416815B1Systems and computerized methods for balancing inventory
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 COUPANG CORP
  • US11416815B1 patent drawing
  • US11416815B1 patent drawing
  • US11416815B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a computerized method for item distribution, including retrieving, from a data structure, an inventory of a SKU at each of a plurality of destinations; determining a buffer of each of the destinations; determining an average buffer across the destinations; identifying at least one high utilization destination and at least one low utilization destination based on differences from the average buffer; and redistributing a network inventory by, iteratively and for each of the high utilization destinations: finding, in the data structure, a low utilization destination having a common attribute with the high utilization destination; and sending, to a user device for display, an instruction to transfer a redistribution quantity of the SKU from the low utilization destination to the high utilization destination.