Inventory Routing via Automation Capability Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern inventory systems face challenges in efficiently managing large numbers of diverse inventory requests, leading to inefficient resource utilization, long response times, and high costs associated with capacity changes, limiting their ability to adapt to throughput fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a management module that directs inventory items between automated and manual handling based on classification, using mobile drive units and inventory holders to optimize resource allocation and reduce trip times, allowing for dynamic changes in handling strategies and infrastructure utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If inventory systems expand capacity to handle more requests, then throughput increases, but infrastructure costs increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidinfrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically routes inventory items between automated and manual handling based on real-time classification, allowing the system to adapt capacity to demand fluctuations without permanent infrastructure expansion. This dynamic allocation enables throughput scaling without proportional infrastructure cost increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal handling framework where inventory items can be processed through multiple pathways (automated or manual) based on their classification. This multi-functionality allows the same infrastructure to serve varying throughput levels by changing routing logic rather than physical expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If inventory systems use automated handling for all items, then processing speed increases, but adaptability to diverse item types decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidhandling flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the inventory flow into different categories (automated-suitable and manual-suitable) based on item classification. This segmentation allows automated high-speed processing for compatible items while directing complex or irregular items to manual handling, maintaining both speed and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different handling qualities are applied to different inventory items based on their specific characteristics. Automated handling with high speed is applied where appropriate, while manual handling with high flexibility is applied where needed, optimizing the system for each item type's requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If inventory systems increase manual handling capacity, then flexibility increases, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of inventory items to determine their suitability for automated handling before routing decisions are made. This preliminary action ensures that items suitable for automation are quickly directed to high-speed automated processes, minimizing response time while maintaining flexibility for items requiring manual handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If inventory systems classify items for automated handling, then resource utilization efficiency increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a classification intermediary that assesses inventory items and determines their routing destination. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system by making automated decision-making based on item characteristics, improving resource utilization without requiring complex real-time human judgment for every item.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10029851B1Routing based on automation capabilities in inventory system
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10029851B1 patent drawing
  • US10029851B1 patent drawing
  • US10029851B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Item information such as an identity or arrangement of a selected inventory item of an inventory system can be determined. A classification of the selected inventory item can be obtained based at least in part on the item information. The selected inventory item can be routed based at least in part on the classification of the selected inventory item. For example, the selected inventory item may be routed for manual handling if the classification of the selected inventory item indicates that the selected inventory item is designated for an operation to be performed relative to the selected inventory item by a human operator. Alternatively, the selected inventory item may be routed for automated handling if the classification of the selected inventory item indicates that the selected inventory item is designated for an operation to be performed relative to the selected inventory item by a robotic manipulator.