Inverse Folding Protein Sequence Optimization With Explainable PSSM Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protein engineering techniques face challenges such as computationally intensive sampling, inefficiency, catastrophic forgetting, and lack of interpretability, making it difficult to navigate the vast protein sequence search space and achieve global optima.

Innovation Solution

A method using an inverse folding model with a Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM) and explainable AI frameworks to bias sequence generation, balancing exploration and exploitation, while maintaining structural accuracy and providing interpretable insights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional oversampling methods are used to generate protein sequences, then a large number of sequences can be produced, but the computational cost is extremely high and the efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of protein sequencesVSAvoidoptimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sampling parameters of the inverse folding model by introducing a Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM) that biases amino acid selection at each position based on learned patterns from high-performing sequences. This parameter change transforms the uniform sampling process into a guided sampling process, significantly improving the quality and diversity of generated sequences while reducing the total number of sequences needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the PSSM is iteratively updated based on the performance of generated sequences. The model evaluates sequences using a predictor, computes attribution scores for each amino acid position, and uses this feedback to refine the PSSM for subsequent sampling rounds. This closed-loop feedback system continuously improves sequence generation quality without requiring proportional increases in computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If Reinforcement Learning is used to fine-tune the generative model, then sequences with desired properties can be favored, but the model suffers from catastrophic forgetting and loses structural accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty optimization accuracyVSAvoidstructural validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization task into two independent components: (1) the inverse folding model that guarantees structurally valid sequences through its pre-trained structural understanding, and (2) the PSSM that guides sampling toward desired properties. By separating these functions, the patent avoids catastrophic forgetting because the structural knowledge in the inverse folding model remains intact while the PSSM handles property optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The PSSM acts as an intermediary between the inverse folding model and the property optimization goal. Instead of directly fine-tuning the model weights (which causes catastrophic forgetting), the PSSM mediates the sampling process by biasing amino acid selection based on property predictions. This intermediary approach allows property optimization without compromising structural validity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If folding accuracy is incorporated into the reward function, then structural validity can be maintained, but the computational burden increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the inverse folding model on structural data before the optimization process. This pre-training establishes strong structural priors in the model, allowing it to generate structurally valid sequences without requiring expensive folding validation during optimization. The structural accuracy is built-in beforehand rather than verified iteratively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If conventional black-box optimization methods are used, then sequence generation can be automated, but interpretability is lost and rational design is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization automationVSAvoidinterpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses explainable AI frameworks to provide feedback on which amino acids contribute most to predicted properties. This feedback mechanism identifies specific positions and amino acids that drive property predictions, enabling rational design decisions while maintaining automation. The interpretability feedback guides subsequent sampling iterations without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250378911A1System and method for explainable optimization of protein sequence using inverse folding model
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 QUANTIPHI INC
  • US20250378911A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378911A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378911A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (400) and system (100) for explainable optimization of protein sequence is disclosed. The method (400) includes initializing Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM) based on probability distribution of the inverse folding model. The method (400) may include generating plurality of protein sequences by sampling from an inverse folding model. The method (400) may further include predicting target property value for each of protein sequences using predictor models. The method (400) further includes computing delta value for each protein sequence by subtracting average predicted target property value across plurality of protein sequences from predicted value for each protein sequence. Further, the method (400) includes determining attribution scores for each amino acid in protein sequence using explainable AI. The method (400) further includes computing position-wise amino acid frequency distribution from protein sequences. The method (400) further includes updating PSSM by combining scaled attribution scores and scaled position-wise amino acid frequency distribution.