Multi-Source Inverse Geometry CT Cone-Beam Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CT systems face challenges with cone-beam artifacts and limited field of view, especially in multi-slice and helical scan modes, due to incomplete data and geometric limitations, which affect image quality and scan coverage.

Innovation Solution

A multi-source inverse geometry CT system with multiple longitudinally offset x-ray sources is used to acquire and reconstruct cone-beam projection data, employing techniques like z-rebinning, trans-axial rebinning, and feathering to combine data from multiple sources, allowing for accurate reconstruction even with less than a full scan, and reducing artifacts by determining cone-angle weights for voxels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cone-beam geometry is used in multi-slice CT systems, then scan coverage and imaging speed are improved, but cone-beam artifacts increase and image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan coverage and imaging speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cone-beam projection data into multiple subsets corresponding to different longitudinal positions. Each subset is reconstructed separately using algorithms optimized for that specific region, thereby reducing the propagation of cone-beam artifacts across the entire image volume while maintaining high scan coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different reconstruction algorithms and parameters to different regions of the image volume based on local characteristics. Specifically, regions with severe cone-beam artifacts use artifact-reduction algorithms, while regions with adequate data use standard reconstruction methods, thereby optimizing image quality locally without compromising overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If detector size is increased to expand field of view, then FOV coverage is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of viewVSAvoiddetector size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the field of view by utilizing the longitudinal dimension through multiple detector rows positioned at different z-locations. Instead of increasing the transverse detector size, the system distributes detector elements along the longitudinal axis, achieving expanded FOV coverage while maintaining manageable detector complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the detector system to serve multiple functions: each detector row not only captures projection data for its specific longitudinal position but also contributes to the overall three-dimensional reconstruction of the entire FOV. This multi-functional design maximizes the utility of each detector element, reducing the total number of detectors needed compared to a single large detector approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If 2D filtered backprojection is used for cone-beam data, then reconstruction speed is improved, but reconstruction accuracy deteriorates due to geometric mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction speedVSAvoidreconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a hybrid approach where 2D filtered backprojection is used as a preliminary reconstruction step to obtain a quick initial image, followed by selective application of 3D reconstruction algorithms only to regions where cone-beam artifacts are detected. This partial application of the more accurate but slower 3D method maintains overall reconstruction speed while improving accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary data preprocessing and geometric correction on the cone-beam projection data before reconstruction, transforming it into a format that is more compatible with 2D filtered backprojection algorithms. This preliminary action reduces the geometric mismatch that would otherwise require full 3D reconstruction, thereby maintaining reconstruction speed while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances image quality and extends scan coverage by effectively combining data from multiple sources, reducing cone-beam artifacts and ensuring accurate reconstructions even with incomplete data sets, while maintaining high image quality.

Implementation Method 1

Each x-ray source emits a fan-beam (or a cone-beam) at different times, and the projection data (e.g., sinograms) is captured by the detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-Ray: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

the projection data (e.g., sinograms) is captured by the detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAttenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS8031829B2Method for analytic reconstruction of cone-beam projection data for multi-source inverse geometry CT systems
Publication Date: 2011.10.04 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US8031829B2 patent drawing
  • US8031829B2 patent drawing
  • US8031829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for analytically reconstructing a multi-axial computed tomography (CT) dataset, acquired using one or more longitudinally-offset x-ray beams emitted from multiple x-ray sources is provided. The method comprises acquiring one or more CT axial projection datasets, wherein the CT axial projection datasets are acquired using less than a full scan of data. The method further comprises reconstructing the CT axial projection datasets to generate a reconstructed image volume. The reconstruction comprises back projecting one or more voxels comprising the multi-axial CT dataset, along one or more projection views, based upon a cone-angle weight determined for the voxels, wherein the cone-angle weight for the voxels is determined along a longitudinal direction.