Inverse Model Transfer Learning for AV Virtual Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle (AV) testing in simulated environments is limited by the complexity of real-world conditions, leading to slow simulation times and inadequate exploration of the design space, which hampers the development of safe and efficient AVs due to varying regulatory requirements and the need for comprehensive testing.

Innovation Solution

An inverse model neural network is used to generate design parameters for AVs, augmented by transferring knowledge from pre-existing models, and visualized through 3D/2D scatter plots or parallel plots to facilitate expert evaluation, enabling efficient exploration of the design space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive testing in simulated environment is performed to understand AV operating patterns and train AI model, then safety and reliability of AV is improved, but time consumption and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAV safetyVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating diverse simulation scenarios and pre-training inverse models with transferred knowledge from existing designs. This allows the simulation to start with pre-prepared test cases and pre-established model structures, reducing the time needed during actual AV safety testing while maintaining comprehensive coverage of operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by using inverse models to directly generate design parameters from desired safety outcomes rather than traditional forward simulation. This parameter inversion approach, combined with knowledge transfer from existing designs, enables faster exploration of the design space while achieving comprehensive safety testing coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If simulation complexity is increased to replicate real-world conditions accurately, then measurement precision and realism are improved, but simulation speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidsimulation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system substitutes traditional forward physics-based simulation mechanics with inverse model-based parameter generation. Instead of running complex forward simulations to infer design parameters from outcomes, the inverse model directly maps desired safety metrics to optimal design parameters, maintaining accuracy while dramatically reducing computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of complex real-world scenarios through pre-generated simulation cases and transferred knowledge models. These copied scenarios capture essential real-world conditions without requiring full physical simulation complexity, enabling faster yet still accurate design parameter generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If design space exploration is expanded to cover all possible AV configurations and scenarios, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but computational resources and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign space coverageVSAvoiddesign exploration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality through the inverse model framework that can handle multiple design configurations and scenario types through a single unified model structure. Knowledge transferred from existing designs enables the model to generalize across different AV configurations, providing broad design space coverage without requiring separate models for each scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system efficiently explores expanded design space by changing approach from exhaustive forward simulation to inverse parameter generation. The inverse model directly computes optimal design parameters for diverse scenarios, and knowledge transfer from existing designs enables rapid adaptation to new configurations, maintaining high productivity even as design space coverage expands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260064917A1Inverse modelling and transfer learning system in autonomous vehicle virtual testing
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 SIEMENS IND SOFTWARE NV
  • US20260064917A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064917A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064917A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of engineering design includes performing a simulation for a design under test of the design interacting in a real-world environment, in a computer processor, generating simulation data from performance of the simulation, storing the generated simulation data in a computer memory, extracting the generated simulation data to train a first inverse model neural network, and generating a plurality of design parameters from the inverse model neural network. A visualization representative of the generated plurality of design parameters for display to a user allows an expert user to evaluate the suggested design parameters and select some or all of the suggested design parameters. For existing designs more data is available for the simulation than for a new design. The inverse model for a new design may be augmented by transferring stored knowledge in a pre-existing inverse model to the model for the new design.