Inverse Modeling for Consistent Part Dimensions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing processes face variations in part dimensions due to numerous input parameters, leading to inconsistencies even when using the same part design, which existing technologies fail to effectively address.

Innovation Solution

An inverse modeling method that imports a 3D reference design, collects metrology data, compares it with actual manufactured parts, and adjusts the design or manufacturing process based on deviations to ensure acceptable tolerances, using processors to revise designs and modify processes dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manufacturing processes are used with fixed part designs, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but part dimension consistency deteriorates due to variations from numerous input parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart dimension consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by comparing actual manufactured part dimensions with target dimensions from the part design, using this comparison data to dynamically adjust manufacturing parameters and part designs, thereby improving dimension consistency while managing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static part designs and fixed manufacturing processes to dynamic models where part designs and manufacturing parameters are continuously adjusted based on real-time comparison data, enabling adaptation to variations in input parameters while maintaining manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple manufacturing iterations are performed to achieve acceptable part dimensions, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity deteriorates due to increased time and resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart dimension accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating dynamic models that predict the effects of manufacturing parameters on part dimensions before actual manufacturing, allowing optimization of manufacturing parameters in advance to reduce the number of iterations needed while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional trial-and-error mechanical manufacturing iterations with computational modeling and simulation, using software-based dynamic models to predict and optimize manufacturing outcomes, thereby reducing physical iteration cycles and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If physics-based simulations are used to predict manufacturing outcomes, then manufacturing precision improves, but the system fails to account for actual in-process variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel accuracy under real conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically collecting actual manufacturing data from the production process, using this real data to continuously refine and update the dynamic models, ensuring the models remain accurate under real manufacturing conditions without requiring external calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual manufactured parts to continuously improve the dynamic models, comparing predicted dimensions with actual measurements and using this information to adjust model parameters, thereby increasing reliability under real manufacturing conditions while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240427948A1Systems and Methods for the Inverse Modeling of Parts and Tools
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 ARIS TECH LLC
  • US20240427948A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427948A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for inverse modeling of a part includes: importing a first electronic file comprising a three-dimensional reference design of a part; manufacturing the part based on the first electronic file; collecting metrology data for the part and creating a second electronic file comprising the collected metrology data; comparing the first electronic file and the second electronic file and determining a deviation based on the comparison; determining whether the deviation is acceptable; and in the event the deviation is determined not to be acceptable, revising the three-dimensional reference design of the part or modifying a manufacturing process for the part.