Inverse Neural Network for Solid-State Detector Signal Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solid-state detectors face challenges in accurately estimating the location, energy level, and time of incident radiation due to material property variations and imperfect fabrication processes, leading to sub-optimal detector performance and increased manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learned model, such as a neural network, is trained to estimate the location, energy level, and time of incident radiation on a solid-state detector, accounting for material property variations and enabling rapid, accurate calculations with minimal data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional inversion methods are used to solve the inverse problem, then measurement accuracy can be maintained, but computational power and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores response functions for all possible interaction positions in a lookup table during system initialization. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time matrix inversions during actual particle detection, reducing computational power requirements while maintaining measurement precision through direct signal matching against pre-computed reference data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies of the complex inverse problem by pre-computing response functions that represent the detector's behavior under various conditions. These copied response patterns are stored and used for rapid comparison during operation, replacing computationally intensive real-time calculations with faster lookup and matching operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If traditional inversion methods with large databases are used, then location estimation accuracy improves, but device complexity and data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation estimation accuracyVSAvoiddatabase volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential response function characteristics needed for particle detection from the complex detector system. By identifying and storing only the critical response patterns in the lookup table rather than complete raw data, the system achieves accurate location estimation with reduced data storage requirements and lower device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing to distill complex detector responses into compact, essential response function representations before storage. This pre-extraction of key features reduces the volume of data that needs to be stored in the lookup table while preserving the information necessary for accurate particle location determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If optimal material properties are required for detector quality, then measurement precision improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from requiring optimal physical material parameters to using computational parameters (response functions) that can be pre-calculated and stored. This parameter transformation allows the use of lower-quality, less expensive materials while maintaining measurement precision through software-based compensation for material imperfections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates computational models (response functions) that copy and represent the detector's behavior under various conditions. These models allow the system to account for material variations and imperfections through data processing rather than requiring physically perfect materials, thereby reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining detector quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If detailed material property variations are accounted for in real-time, then measurement precision improves, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property variation compensationVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates response functions that incorporate material property variations for all possible interaction positions during system initialization. By performing this computationally intensive work in advance, the system can rapidly compensate for material variations during actual particle detection through simple lookup and comparison operations, maintaining measurement precision while minimizing real-time computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution enables more accurate and efficient detection of incident radiation, allowing for the use of detectors with worse material uniformity while maintaining high-quality estimations, and reducing computational power and time requirements.

Implementation Method 1

Signals induced due to the drift of charges (e.g., electrons and holes) within a solid-state device are characteristics of the material properties of the device itself

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge drift:

Data Source

PatentUS12223431B2Inverse neural network for particle detection in a solid-state-devices
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US12223431B2 patent drawing
  • US12223431B2 patent drawing
  • US12223431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For training to and/or estimating location, energy level, and/or time of occurrence of incident radiation on a solid-state detector, a machine-learned model, such as a neural network, performs the inverse problem. An estimate of the location, energy level, and/or time is output by the machine-learned model in response to input of the detected signal (e.g., voltage over time). The estimate may account for material property variation of the solid-state detector in a rapid and easily calculated way, and with a minimal amount of data.