Inverse Parking Distance Control System for Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In urban areas, the increasing demand for parking spaces and the lack of parking distance control (PDC) systems in many vehicles pose a challenge, as drivers often face difficulty in locating suitable spaces and are distracted, leading to potential accidents while parking.

Innovation Solution

An inverse PDC system that uses sensors and processors to detect approaching vehicles without active PDC systems, providing timely audio/visual alerts to assist drivers by determining the type of entity and its proximity, thereby preventing collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a PDC system is installed in all vehicles, then parking safety is improved, but vehicle cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking safetyVSAvoidvehicle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional PDC approach by making the parked vehicle (stationary object) the active detector and the approaching vehicle (moving object) the passive target. Instead of requiring the moving vehicle to have PDC, the stationary vehicle uses its sensors to detect and alert the approaching vehicle, reversing who performs the detection function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The parked vehicle serves itself by using its own sensor resources to detect approaching vehicles and provide alerts, eliminating the need for the approaching vehicle to have its own PDC system. The stationary vehicle's sensing capabilities are leveraged to protect both vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If sensors continuously monitor for approaching vehicles, then detection reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic sensing with variable intervals - sensors are activated at different times based on conditions rather than continuous operation. The parked vehicle monitors at intervals that adapt to the situation, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection reliability when vehicles are approaching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensing system dynamically adjusts its operation based on detected conditions. When no vehicles are present, sensing frequency is reduced; when vehicles are detected, monitoring intensity increases. This dynamic adaptation optimizes the balance between detection reliability and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11335194B1Inverse parking distance control system
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11335194B1 patent drawing
  • US11335194B1 patent drawing
  • US11335194B1 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to providing inverse parking distance control (PDC). In one embodiment, a method for providing inverse PDC includes obtaining sensor data indicating an entity approaching the vehicle, determining whether the entity is a parking vehicle based on one or more characteristics of the entity derived based on the sensor data, determining whether the entity is utilizing a PDC system, and triggering a proximity alert when the entity approaches within a threshold distance of the vehicle and is determined to be a parking vehicle that is not utilizing a PDC system.