Inverse Precipitation for Biologic Encapsulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming microparticles with biologics, such as proteins and peptides, face challenges in achieving high loading, controlled release, and uniformity due to limitations in existing water-in-oil-in-water emulsification processes, which often result in burst release and low loading capacities.

Innovation Solution

A method involving rapid, controlled precipitation to form nanoparticles with a hydrophilic core and amphiphilic copolymer shell, allowing for high loading and precise control of release rates by using amphiphilic copolymers to stabilize and aggregate nanoparticles into microparticles, eliminating the need for a matrix and enabling loadings up to 80 wt%.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If water-in-oil-in-water emulsification processes are used to form microparticles, then microparticles can be produced, but loading capacity is limited and burst release occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading capacityVSAvoidrelease control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the encapsulation process by using reverse nanofprecipitation instead of emulsification, altering the phase separation mechanism and solvent system to achieve high loading capacity without burst release

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes controlled phase transition through reverse nanofprecipitation, where the biologic transitions from soluble to precipitated state in a controlled manner, forming stable nanoparticles with high loading capacity and preventing burst release

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Quantity of substance

If high loading of biologic is achieved in microparticles, then more therapeutic agent is delivered, but release control becomes difficult and uniformity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiologic loadingVSAvoidrelease uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the biologic loading process into controlled nanofprecipitation steps, forming individual nanoparticles with uniform characteristics that maintain release control even at high loading capacities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the precipitation process, including solvent composition, temperature, and mixing conditions, to achieve uniform nanoparticle formation with high biologic loading while maintaining controlled release profiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If rapid precipitation is used to form nanoparticles, then high loading capacity is achieved, but control over particle formation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading capacityVSAvoidprocess control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control through monitored nanofprecipitation parameters, adjusting conditions in real-time to maintain both high loading capacity and precise control over nanoparticle formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters including solvent composition, temperature, pH, and mixing rate to achieve rapid yet controlled precipitation, balancing high loading capacity with manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of microparticles with high loading capacities and controlled release profiles, overcoming the limitations of previous methods by providing stable, prolonged release of biologics without burst release, and allowing for precise control of release rates.

Implementation Method 1

Water soluble molecules—including peptides, proteins, DNA, RNA, non-biologic therapeutics, polysaccharide-based therapeutics (e.g., tobramycin) and imaging agents—precipitate into nanoparticles that are protected by a copolymer stabilizing agent. The particles thus made are colloidally stable in the first nonpolar solvent phase.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteric stabilization: Surfactant

Implementation Method 2

A method involving rapid, controlled precipitation to form nanoparticles with a hydrophilic core and amphiphilic copolymer shell, allowing for high loading and precise control of release rates by using amphiphilic copolymers to stabilize and aggregate nanoparticles into microparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAmphiphilic copolymer stabilization: Amphiphiles

Implementation Method 3

A method of the invention for encapsulating water soluble molecules using rapid, controlled precipitation is presented.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid precipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 4

The particles thus made are colloidally stable in the first nonpolar solvent phase.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupersaturation: Supersaturation

Data Source

PatentUS11103461B2Process for encapsulating soluble biologics, therapeutics, and imaging agents
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIV
  • US11103461B2 patent drawing
  • US11103461B2 patent drawing
  • US11103461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An “inverse” precipitation route to precipitate aqueous soluble species with copolymers as nanoparticles having a hydrophilic, polar core and a less polar shell is described. The aggregation of these nanoparticles to form larger microparticles and monoliths provides a highly loaded construct (e.g., a depot) for the sustained and controlled release of actives.