Inverted Filament Winder for Pipe Lining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pipe lining technologies, such as CIPP and SIPP, face issues with wrinkling, creep failure, and inability to meet Class IV lining standards for long-term hoop strength and resistance to internal pressure, especially in large diameter pipes, due to the limitations of thermosetting polymers and the need for multiple layer applications which increase cost and risk of mechanical failure.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for applying a multi-layer pipe lining structure with spirally or helically wound reinforcement filaments embedded between elastomeric and rigid layers, using UV-curable or heat-curable resin, to enhance hoop strength and reduce creep failure by distributing stress more evenly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thermosetting polymer linings are applied to meet Class IV lining standards for long-term hoop strength, then the lining can resist internal pressure, but the lining suffers from creep failure under long-term continuous stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehoop strengthVSAvoidresistance to creep failure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a composite lining structure combining thermosetting polymer with high-strength fibers (such as glass, carbon, or aramid fibers) arranged in specific orientations. The fiber-reinforced composite material provides enhanced hoop strength and creep resistance, allowing the lining to meet Class IV standards while maintaining long-term reliability under internal pressure loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If multiple layers of lining are applied to large diameter pipes to achieve required strength, then the structural requirements are met, but the application time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidapplication time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reinforcement into discrete high-strength fiber layers with specific orientations (e.g., circumferential, helical, axial) applied in a optimized sequence. This segmentation allows each layer to provide specific structural functions, achieving required strength with fewer layers compared to conventional multi-layer polymer applications, thereby reducing application time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the lining wall thickness is increased to meet structural requirements, then the hoop strength is improved, but the cross-sectional diameter and flow capacity of the rehabilitated pipe are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehoop strengthVSAvoidflow capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using high-strength fibers with superior mechanical properties compared to conventional polymers. This parameter change allows achieving the required hoop strength with significantly reduced wall thickness, thereby maintaining the cross-sectional diameter and flow capacity of the rehabilitated pipe while meeting structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Shape

If CIPP liner material is designed with shorter circumference to remove wrinkles, then the liner smoothness is improved, but annuluses or circumferential gaps are created between the liner and host pipe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner smoothnessVSAvoidcircumferential gaps
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible fiber-reinforced composite material that can accommodate pipe bends and irregularities without wrinkling. The high elongation capability of the fiber composite allows the liner to conform to the host pipe geometry while maintaining smoothness, eliminating both wrinkles and circumferential gaps through proper material selection and layer configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly increases the working life of pipe linings against creep failure and meets Class IV lining standards by reducing stress on the rigid liner, allowing for long-term resistance to internal pressure without compromising flow capacity or increasing costs.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the filament to UV light to set and adhere the filament to the elastomeric layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUV-curable resin photopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

UV-curable or heat-curable resin, to enhance hoop strength and reduce creep failure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat-curable resin curing:

Data Source

PatentUS10377078B2Inverted filament winder for pipeline rehabilitation
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 SIPP TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10377078B2 patent drawing
  • US10377078B2 patent drawing
  • US10377078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pipe lining apparatus having a settable, resin-impregnated reinforcement filament that is helically wound onto the inner surface of a pipe or pipe lining by an inverted filament winding apparatus, the apparatus having multiple spools and applicator arms to retain and apply the filament. The applicator arms may be aligned circumferentially or axially.