Inverted-U Barrier for Aircraft Loader Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft loader safety systems are complex and time-consuming to implement, failing to provide an effective barrier between the bridge and elevator platforms when they are not at the same level, which can lead to operator falls.

Innovation Solution

A barrier system with a kick plate mechanism and inverted-U-shaped element that responds to the movement of the elevator platform, providing a guardrail when platforms are at different heights and retracting when they are at the same level, along with a bolt and nut arrangement as shear safety pins for added security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a retractable handrail mechanism is mounted along the end of the bridge platform to prevent operator falling, then operator safety is improved, but the system becomes quite complex to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential safety function from the complex retractable handrail mechanism and implements it through a simpler barrier system consisting of a barrier member that can be raised or lowered, supported by support members. This removes unnecessary complexity while retaining the core safety function of preventing operator falls between platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the barrier system by using a barrier member that can transition between raised and lowered positions based on the relative height of platforms. This simple positional change provides safety without requiring complex mechanisms, resolving the contradiction between safety and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a barrier system is made responsive to elevator platform movement to provide automatic safety, then operator safety is improved, but the system becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is designed to automatically respond to platform movement through self-service mechanisms. The support members are configured to automatically raise or lower the barrier member based on the relative position of the platforms, eliminating the need for complex control systems or additional actuators while maintaining automatic safety responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If guardrails are made retractable to allow goods passage when platforms are at the same level, then loading efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system implements a dynamic configuration where the barrier member can transition between raised and lowered states. When platforms are at different levels, the barrier is raised to prevent falls; when platforms are at the same level, the barrier is lowered to allow goods passage. This dynamic adaptability improves loading efficiency without requiring overly complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2094566B1Barrier system for an aircraft loader
Publication Date: 2014.01.08 TLD CANADA
  • EP2094566B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP2094566B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP2094566B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A barrier system for an aircraft loader having a bridge platform and an elevator platform. The system has first and second guiding elements respectively attached to the bridge platform on each side thereof, and first and second supporting elements respectively mounted on a corresponding side of the elevator platform. The barrier system is provided with an inverted-U-shaped element having first and second legs and a transverse element extending therebetween, each of the legs being slidably mounted inside a corresponding guiding element and cooperating with a corresponding supporting element adapted for supporting the legs and driving the inverted-U-shaped element with the elevator platform. The inverted-U-shaped element is slidable between a raised position providing a passage for loads thereunder when both platforms interface and a lower position wherein the transverse element extends across the passage for providing a guardrail between the platforms when the elevator platform extends below the bridge platform.