Inverter Shutdown Circuit for Controlled High-Voltage Safe State

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inverter control methods in high-voltage networks face challenges in achieving a controlled transition to a safe state without causing undesirable transient currents or voltage fluctuations, particularly when safety-relevant faults occur, leading to immediate shutdowns that stress inverter components.

Innovation Solution

A circuit arrangement comprising a monitoring circuit, microcontroller, gate driver, and redundant shutdown device, which monitors the inverter's status and components, allowing controlled transitions to a safe state through the microcontroller if available, or activating the redundant shutdown device if not, thereby reducing stress on power transistors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the inverter is switched to a safe state (freewheeling or active short circuit) when a safety-relevant fault occurs, then safety integrity is ensured, but immediate shutdown causes high transient currents and voltage fluctuations that stress inverter components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety integrityVSAvoidtransient currents and voltage fluctuations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit continuously monitors the inverter status and components before a fault occurs, preparing status data for potential controlled shutdown. When a fault occurs, this pre-collected information enables immediate determination of the optimal shutdown path without delay, reducing transient effects while ensuring safety integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring circuit acts as an intermediary between the fault detection and shutdown execution. It evaluates the inverter status and components, then determines whether to enable controlled shutdown via microcontroller or immediate shutdown via redundant shutdown device, optimizing the balance between safety and minimizing transient currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If immediate shutdown is performed via redundant shutdown device when safety-relevant fault occurs, then safety is ensured, but power transistors must be designed for maximum currents increasing device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidpower transistor design requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit provides continuous feedback on the inverter status and component health. This feedback enables the system to determine whether controlled shutdown is feasible, allowing power transistors to be designed for lower maximum currents since controlled shutdown will be used when conditions permit, reducing device complexity while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If controlled shutdown is attempted via microcontroller, then transient currents are reduced, but shutdown cannot occur if monitoring level detects safety-relevant fault

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransient currentsVSAvoidshutdown capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shutdown mechanism dynamically adapts based on real-time monitoring of inverter status and components. The system can switch between controlled shutdown (when status permits) and immediate shutdown (when status indicates danger), ensuring both reduced transient currents and reliable shutdown capability under all fault conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring circuit performs beforehand evaluation of the inverter status to determine if controlled shutdown is safe. This pre-evaluation cushions against attempting controlled shutdown when it would be dangerous, while still enabling the benefits of controlled shutdown when conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP4675907A1Circuit arrangement for controlling an inverter and method
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • EP4675907A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4675907A1 patent drawing
  • EP4675907A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a circuit arrangement (10) for controlling an inverter (3) in a high-voltage network, wherein the inverter (3) is connected to an electric machine (4) and a high-voltage battery (2), wherein the circuit arrangement (10) comprises at least one microcontroller (12), at least one monitoring circuit (11) for the microcontroller (12), at least one gate driver module (13) for the inverter (3), and a redundant shutdown device (15) for performing a shutdown operation of the inverter (3), wherein the monitoring circuit (11) is configured to receive at least status data (ZD) of the at least one gate driver module (13) and the inverter (3), and wherein the monitoring circuit (11) is configured to monitor the availability of the microcontroller (12) in the event of a fault in which the electric machine (4) must be brought into a safe state.to check the at least one gate driver module (13) and the inverter (3) to see if a controlled or regulated transfer of the electric machine (4) via the microcontroller (12) is possible, wherein, if this is not possible, the shutdown process is carried out via the redundant shutdown device (15) and otherwise the shutdown process is initiated by the microcontroller (12), wherein the monitoring circuit (11) is further configured to monitor the shutdown process by the microcontroller (12) and, in the event of a fault, to carry out the shutdown via the redundant shutdown device (15), as well as a method for controlling an inverter (3).