3D Scanning System for Investment Casting Mold Evaluation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for non-destructive evaluation of molds and crucibles in investment casting processes are time-consuming, require specialized personnel, and can lead to contamination and casting failures due to reactivity issues with highly reactive alloys, necessitating a more efficient and non-destructive inspection technique.
Innovation Solution
A system comprising a 3D scanning device and computer component that generates a difference map between the outer surface of a mold or crucible and a nominal model, allowing for non-destructive evaluation of wall thickness and structural integrity, using a support with a locating mechanism to secure the crucible in a repeatable orientation and a robotic apparatus for placement and removal.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If X-ray technology is used to analyze structural integrity of molds and crucibles, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces complex X-ray imaging systems with a simpler optical measurement system. A camera captures images of the crucible interior, and image processing algorithms calculate wall thickness by analyzing the geometry of the captured images. This substitution of optical methods for X-ray technology reduces device complexity while maintaining measurement capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a visual copy (image) of the crucible interior using a camera, then processes this copy to extract wall thickness information. Instead of directly measuring physical dimensions or using complex imaging, the system captures an optical copy and derives measurements through image analysis, simplifying the overall measurement system.
2Measurement precision
If point-contact measurement methods are used to check wall thickness, then measurement precision is improved, but the crucible surface is damaged
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces mechanical contact measurement (dial indicators touching the crucible surface) with optical non-contact measurement. A camera captures images of the crucible interior, and software processes these images to determine wall thickness. This eliminates mechanical contact and associated surface damage while maintaining measurement precision.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary medium (optical field/image capture) between the measurement system and the crucible. Instead of direct mechanical contact, the measurement is performed through captured images that serve as an intermediary representation of the crucible geometry, allowing precise measurement without physical contact.
3Device complexity
If low-frequency sampling inspection is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent enables self-service automation where the system automatically captures images, processes them through algorithms, and generates wall thickness measurements without requiring specialized personnel. This automation allows frequent inspection to be performed easily, dramatically increasing productivity while keeping the device relatively simple.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the inspection parameter from periodic manual sampling to continuous or frequent automated measurement. By transforming the inspection process into an automated optical measurement system, the frequency of inspection can be increased without proportionally increasing complexity, as the automated system requires minimal intervention.
4Adaptability or versatility
If highly reactive alloys are melted in refractory oxide crucibles, then manufacturing versatility is improved, but contamination occurs
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses graphite crucibles that provide a chemically inert environment for melting highly reactive alloys. The graphite material does not react with reactive alloys like titanium, preventing contamination. This creates an inert melting environment that preserves alloy purity while maintaining the ability to melt various alloy types.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs composite crucible designs, such as graphite crucibles with specific coatings or structures, that combine chemical inertness with thermal properties suitable for melting reactive alloys. This composite approach allows versatile alloy melting without the reactivity problems of pure refractory oxide materials.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables fast and efficient non-destructive evaluation of molds and crucibles, reducing the risk of contamination and casting failures by accurately assessing wall thickness and structural integrity, thereby increasing casting yields and maintaining quality control.
Implementation Method 1
a three-dimensional (3D) scanning device effective for scanning an outer surface of a target region of the mold or crucible in order to generate a three-dimensional (3D) structure of the scanned outer surface
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3A~3B
AI summary
The present disclosure relates to systems and methods useful for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of molds and crucibles used in investment casting processes, including, without limitation, for producing aircraft engines, land-based turbine engines, and the like. According to one aspect, the present disclosure provides a system for non-destructive evaluation that includes a support, a 3D scanning device, and a computer component. According to another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for non-destructive evaluation that includes the steps of: providing a system for non-destructive evaluation of a mold or crucible according to the present disclosure; securing a mold or crucible to the support of the system; and operating the 3D scanning device of the system in conjunction with the computer component in order to create a 3D structure difference map that indicates whether the mold or crucible falls within or outside a desired structural integrity parameter range.