3D Scanning System for Investment Casting Mold Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for non-destructive evaluation of molds and crucibles in investment casting processes are time-consuming, require specialized personnel, and can lead to contamination and casting failures due to reactivity issues with highly reactive alloys, necessitating a more efficient and non-destructive inspection technique.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a 3D scanning device and computer component that generates a difference map between the outer surface of a mold or crucible and a nominal model, allowing for non-destructive evaluation of wall thickness and structural integrity, using a support with a locating mechanism to secure the crucible in a repeatable orientation and a robotic apparatus for placement and removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If X-ray technology is used to analyze structural integrity of molds and crucibles, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity analysisVSAvoidspecialized equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex X-ray imaging systems with a simpler optical measurement system. A camera captures images of the crucible interior, and image processing algorithms calculate wall thickness by analyzing the geometry of the captured images. This substitution of optical methods for X-ray technology reduces device complexity while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a visual copy (image) of the crucible interior using a camera, then processes this copy to extract wall thickness information. Instead of directly measuring physical dimensions or using complex imaging, the system captures an optical copy and derives measurements through image analysis, simplifying the overall measurement system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If point-contact measurement methods are used to check wall thickness, then measurement precision is improved, but the crucible surface is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewall thickness measurementVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contact measurement (dial indicators touching the crucible surface) with optical non-contact measurement. A camera captures images of the crucible interior, and software processes these images to determine wall thickness. This eliminates mechanical contact and associated surface damage while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary medium (optical field/image capture) between the measurement system and the crucible. Instead of direct mechanical contact, the measurement is performed through captured images that serve as an intermediary representation of the crucible geometry, allowing precise measurement without physical contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If low-frequency sampling inspection is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection systemVSAvoidinspection frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service automation where the system automatically captures images, processes them through algorithms, and generates wall thickness measurements without requiring specialized personnel. This automation allows frequent inspection to be performed easily, dramatically increasing productivity while keeping the device relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the inspection parameter from periodic manual sampling to continuous or frequent automated measurement. By transforming the inspection process into an automated optical measurement system, the frequency of inspection can be increased without proportionally increasing complexity, as the automated system requires minimal intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If highly reactive alloys are melted in refractory oxide crucibles, then manufacturing versatility is improved, but contamination occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloy melting capabilityVSAvoidalloy contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses graphite crucibles that provide a chemically inert environment for melting highly reactive alloys. The graphite material does not react with reactive alloys like titanium, preventing contamination. This creates an inert melting environment that preserves alloy purity while maintaining the ability to melt various alloy types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite crucible designs, such as graphite crucibles with specific coatings or structures, that combine chemical inertness with thermal properties suitable for melting reactive alloys. This composite approach allows versatile alloy melting without the reactivity problems of pure refractory oxide materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables fast and efficient non-destructive evaluation of molds and crucibles, reducing the risk of contamination and casting failures by accurately assessing wall thickness and structural integrity, thereby increasing casting yields and maintaining quality control.

Implementation Method 1

a three-dimensional (3D) scanning device effective for scanning an outer surface of a target region of the mold or crucible in order to generate a three-dimensional (3D) structure of the scanned outer surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP2994719B1Systems and methods for nondestructive evaluation of molds and crucibles used in investment casting
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2994719B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2994719B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2994719B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods useful for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of molds and crucibles used in investment casting processes, including, without limitation, for producing aircraft engines, land-based turbine engines, and the like. According to one aspect, the present disclosure provides a system for non-destructive evaluation that includes a support, a 3D scanning device, and a computer component. According to another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for non-destructive evaluation that includes the steps of: providing a system for non-destructive evaluation of a mold or crucible according to the present disclosure; securing a mold or crucible to the support of the system; and operating the 3D scanning device of the system in conjunction with the computer component in order to create a 3D structure difference map that indicates whether the mold or crucible falls within or outside a desired structural integrity parameter range.