Investment Analysis Console with Dynamic Security Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphical user interfaces and console management systems for investment analysis are inefficient and lack adaptability, requiring manual processes and lacking real-time data integration and security protocols that can be rapidly updated to meet emerging needs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that provides a graphical user interface for operator console management, enabling analysis and modeling metrics to be determined at server-side, proxy, or client-side, with user feedback and data aggregation to update models, utilizing secure protocols and data structures for efficient and secure data handling and modeling processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used for investment analysis, then system simplicity is maintained, but efficiency and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveinvestment analysis efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service investment analysis through AI models that automatically process financial data, generate analysis reports, and update models based on new data without requiring manual intervention for each analysis task

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical analysis processes are replaced with automated computational systems including AI models, machine learning algorithms, and automated data processing pipelines that perform investment analysis electronically

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed security protocols are implemented, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to emerging security needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity protocol adaptabilityVSAvoidprotocol stability

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Security protocols are implemented as dynamic, updatable configurations rather than fixed rules. The system allows security parameters and protocols to be modified and updated in response to emerging security threats while maintaining operational stability through controlled update mechanisms

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor security performance and emerging threats, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation of security protocols based on actual system usage and new security requirements

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If real-time data integration is implemented, then analysis accuracy is improved, but data handling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoiddata integration complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Data integration intermediaries and abstraction layers are introduced to manage complex data sources. These intermediaries standardize data interfaces, handle data transformation, and provide unified access to multiple data sources without exposing underlying complexity to the analysis engine

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The data integration system is segmented into modular components including data collection modules, data validation modules, data transformation modules, and analysis modules. Each component handles specific aspects of data processing independently, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If operator-tailored models are allowed, then user feedback utilization is improved, but model management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveuser feedback integrationVSAvoidmodel management complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements structured feedback mechanisms where operator inputs and feedback are systematically collected, processed, and used to update and recalibrate AI models. This creates a closed-loop system that continuously improves model performance based on actual user experience and observed outcomes

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The model management system provides universal interfaces and standardized processes that handle multiple model types and update scenarios through unified mechanisms, reducing the operational complexity despite supporting diverse tailored models

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11477204B2Graphical user interface and console management, modeling, and analysis system

Publication Date: 2022.10.18 JOSEPH SHAWN

AI summary

One or more graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and/or a console management, modeling, and analysis system is described. In some embodiments, the GUI and/or management system can be used to analyze investment purchases and/or sales. In some embodiments, users may be allowed to enter data used to produce dynamic models. In some embodiments, data may be aggregated from various users and/or sources to provide adaptive, dynamic models and/or projections.