Invoice Payment Prediction Using Historical Due-Date Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively enrich financial transaction records with counterparty and classification information, and predict payment timelines for invoices, leading to inefficiencies in financial data management.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing machine learning models to enrich financial transaction records by identifying correspondences with additional data sources and predict payment timelines based on historical invoice data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to enrich financial transaction records with counterparty and classification information, then data accuracy and completeness are improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical financial transaction data to learn patterns and relationships between transactions, counterparties, and classification categories. This preliminary training enables the models to automatically enrich new transaction records with accurate counterparty identification and classification information without requiring complex real-time analysis infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary enrichment layer between raw financial transaction data and the financial management system. This intermediary component uses pre-trained machine learning models to bridge the gap by automatically inferring missing counterparty and classification information, thereby improving data accuracy without significantly increasing the complexity of the core financial system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to predict payment timelines for invoices, then payment prediction accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models for payment timeline prediction are trained in advance on historical invoice data, capturing patterns in payment behaviors, due dates, and actual payment times. This preliminary training allows the system to generate accurate payment predictions for new invoices rapidly, without requiring extensive real-time computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies payment prediction only to invoices where prediction is most valuable (e.g., outstanding invoices awaiting payment), rather than processing all financial data uniformly. This selective application reduces overall processing time while maintaining high prediction accuracy for the most critical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If multiple data sources are integrated to enrich financial records, then information completeness is improved, but data integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data enrichment framework that can integrate multiple data sources (bank transactions, accounting records, invoice data) through a common machine learning-based interface. This universal approach handles diverse data formats and sources uniformly, reducing integration complexity while improving information completeness across all financial records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary enrichment layer is introduced that acts as a mediator between multiple heterogeneous data sources and the core financial system. This intermediary uses machine learning models to harmonize and integrate data from different sources, automatically resolving format differences and data inconsistencies, thereby improving information completeness without proportionally increasing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If automated enrichment processes are implemented, then productivity is improved, but initial setup and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsetup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical financial data to learn patterns in transactions, counterparties, and payment behaviors. This preliminary training phase, while requiring significant initial effort, enables the automated enrichment processes to operate efficiently with minimal human intervention once deployed, thereby improving long-term productivity despite high initial setup requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where prediction and enrichment results are continuously evaluated against actual outcomes (e.g., actual payment times vs. predicted times). This feedback is used to retrain and improve the machine learning models over time, reducing the need for manual adjustments and decreasing setup complexity as the system becomes more accurate and self-optimizing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260030662A1Invoice Payment Prediction Using Machine Learning Models
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 STATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • US20260030662A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030662A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030662A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, configured to provide data pertaining to accounting data, comprises a processing circuitry, configured to perform the following method: (a) obtain a data item indicative of an invoice associated with a business entity; (b) predict at least one time of payment associated with the data item, based on at least on a payment-due time associated with the data item. The prediction utilizes at least one machine learning model trained to perform the prediction based at least on times of payment of invoices associated with at least one business entity, and on payment-due times associated with the invoices; and (c) provide the predicted at least one time of payment.