Invoice Processing Platform for Accurate Payor Coding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manually processing invoices for multiple properties within complex ownership and cost allocation structures is time-consuming and difficult, especially when determining which sub-entity should pay an invoice, and existing automated systems fail to fully code invoices for accurate data indexing and cost allocations.

Innovation Solution

An automated invoice processing platform using machine learning to interpret invoices, historical data, and vendor information to determine the correct sub-entity for payment, providing full coding and integration into existing accounts payable workflows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual processing is used to determine which sub-entity should pay an invoice, then accuracy in determining the correct payor can be maintained, but processing time and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in determining correct payorVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processing with an automated machine learning system that uses neural networks to analyze invoice data, historical data, and vendor information to automatically determine the correct sub-entity payor, eliminating human labor while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the machine learning model independently processes invoices, makes determinations about correct payors, and integrates with existing AP workflows without requiring continuous human intervention or manual coding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If traditional automated systems with basic OCR are used, then data entry automation is achieved, but the system cannot fully code invoices for accurate indexing and cost allocations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry automationVSAvoidcoding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces basic OCR with advanced machine learning models including neural networks that can interpret complex invoice documents, historical data patterns, and vendor information to automatically perform accurate coding, indexing, and cost allocation without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the processing parameters from simple text recognition to multi-dimensional analysis incorporating historical data, vendor profiles, and contextual information, enabling the system to accurately determine coding, GL codes, and cost allocations that were previously impossible to automate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual coding of invoices is performed, then accurate indexing and cost allocation can be achieved, but it forms a bottleneck at the front-end of invoice processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindexing and cost allocation accuracyVSAvoidinvoice processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual coding operations with an automated machine learning system that processes thousands of invoices simultaneously, eliminating the bottleneck by using AI-based classification and coding capabilities that operate continuously without human limitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous automated processing where machine learning models continuously analyze invoices, historical data, and vendor information to perform coding and indexing operations without interruption, maintaining high throughput while ensuring accurate cost allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260004330A1Document processing platform
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 PREDICTAP INC
  • US20260004330A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004330A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004330A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An invoice processing system is proved. The system includes a database and a server in electronic communication with the database. The server is operative to: interpret an invoice; interpret historical data from the database, the historical data corresponding to at least one of one or more vendors of past invoices or one or more payors of past invoices; and in response to the interpretation of the invoice, determine a vendor of the invoice based at least in part on the historical data. The server is further operative to in response to the determination of the vendor, determine a value for each of one or more judgment fields via machine learning based at least in part on the historical data and the vendor; and transmit the invoice with the vendor and the value for each of the one or more judgment fields.