Invoice Scoring Platform for Buyer-Free Supply Chain Finance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional supply chain financing systems require manual invoice approval by the buyer, which is unpredictable, labor-intensive, and creates bottlenecks, limiting scalability and accessibility to smaller suppliers.

Innovation Solution

A finance management platform that automates invoice processing and scoring using machine learning and algorithmic models to determine financing eligibility, eliminating the need for buyer approval and enabling immediate payment to suppliers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual invoice approval by the buyer is implemented, then risk control is improved, but processing time and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk controlVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment and scoring of invoices before they reach the buyer for approval. By pre-evaluating invoice risk using automated scoring models, the system prepares risk information in advance, allowing buyers to make faster approval decisions without compromising risk control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated electronic scoring systems. Machine learning models and algorithms automatically evaluate invoice risk, substituting human manual assessment with computational analysis, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining or improving risk control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual invoice approval processes are used, then risk assessment is improved, but scalability and accessibility to smaller suppliers worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessmentVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service risk assessment where invoices are automatically scored and evaluated without requiring manual buyer intervention for each invoice. This automated self-assessment capability allows the system to scale efficiently while maintaining consistent risk assessment standards across all suppliers regardless of size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of risk assessment from manual qualitative evaluation to automated quantitative scoring. By transforming risk assessment into measurable parameters that can be processed algorithmically, the system achieves both reliable risk assessment and scalability to handle large numbers of suppliers including smaller ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If buyer approval is required for financing, then financing risk is controlled, but processing efficiency and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancing risk controlVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary financing eligibility assessment and risk scoring before the buyer approval stage. By pre-determining which invoices meet financing criteria through automated scoring, the system reduces the workload for buyer approval while maintaining risk control, thereby improving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the risk assessment and financing eligibility determination functions from the buyer approval process itself. By separating these functions into independent automated scoring systems, the buyer approval process focuses only on final authorization, improving both risk control and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If traditional SCF systems are implemented, then large corporations benefit from lower financing rates, but implementation and management costs outweigh advantages for smaller entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancing rate advantageVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal financing platform that serves both large corporations and smaller suppliers through the same automated processes. The multi-functional scoring system handles diverse invoice types and supplier sizes uniformly, eliminating the need for separate complex implementation processes for different entity sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual implementation and management processes with automated electronic systems. Machine learning models and algorithmic processing substitute for manual system setup and management, reducing implementation complexity and ongoing management costs while maintaining financing rate advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12499492B2Finance management platform and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 PREVISE LTD
  • US12499492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A finance management platform and method are disclosed. A model element data repository encodes a plurality of model elements representing invoicing outcomes, each model element including a score value. A processor is configured to execute computer program code for providing a finance management platform for a plurality of clients, including receiving invoicing data from a client data repository remote from the finance management platform, translating the received invoicing data into a common format and store the invoicing data in the common format in an invoice data repository, accessing the model element data repository and determine one or more of the model elements applicable to the invoicing data, calculating an overall score for the invoicing data from the applicable model element's scores and triggering a communication to a payment processor and an update to the invoice data repository upon the overall score exceeding a predetermined threshold.