IO-Link Logic Adapter for Cyclic Data Conversion and Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing IO-Link system faces challenges such as limited master ports, incompatible cyclic data structures, high latency in sensor-actuator feedback, and the need for specific data formats that are not provided by connected IO-Link devices.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a distributor block for converting data-elements into input scalar signals, a combiner block for combining input scalar signals, a merger block for reconverting output signals into data-elements, and a logic block for performing logic operations, allowing for flexible and reliable processing of data elements. This apparatus acts as a configurable logic adapter, enabling efficient data processing and communication between IO-Link devices and a master device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additional sensors or actuators are added to extend functionality, then the system functionality is improved, but the number of available master ports becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmaster port availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into a master device and multiple slave devices, where the master device maintains a limited number of ports while slave devices can be dynamically added or removed. Each slave device independently connects to the master through available ports, allowing system expansion without increasing master port count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The master device is designed with universal communication capabilities that can interface with multiple types of slave devices (sensors, actuators, etc.) through the same port structure. This multi-functionality allows diverse devices to connect without requiring dedicated ports for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a device is replaced with a similar one having different cyclic data structure, then device availability is maintained, but data structure compatibility becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice availabilityVSAvoiddata structure compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic changing of data structure parameters through configuration files. When a device is replaced, the corresponding configuration file can be modified to reflect the new device's data structure characteristics, enabling seamless adaptation without hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The data structure handling is made dynamic through runtime configuration capabilities. The master device can adapt its data processing to match the connected slave device's structure by loading appropriate configuration parameters, allowing flexible device replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If data preprocessing is performed to meet specific client requirements, then data format compatibility is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata format compatibilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Data preprocessing operations are configured in advance through configuration files that define the required processing steps. This preliminary configuration allows the system to automatically perform necessary data transformations without requiring complex runtime decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A configuration file acts as an intermediary between the master device and slave devices, translating between different data structures and formats. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of data format conversion, shielding the main processing logic from format variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If feedback latency is reduced for sensor-actuator communication, then system responsiveness is improved, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback latencyVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by allowing different communication cycles and processing depths for different slave devices. Critical sensor-actuator pairs can use short cycles with minimal processing, while less time-sensitive devices use longer cycles, optimizing the balance between responsiveness and processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250068575A1Apparatus for processing incoming and/or outgoing data-elements
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 TECONCEPT GMBH
  • US20250068575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068575A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an apparatus (200) for processing incoming and/or outgoing data-elements (11) cyclically, the data-elements (11) representing numerical and/or logical values that are linked to an upper-layer application.