IOI-Based Block Trading System with Online Negotiation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current financial trading systems, such as AutEx, are limited by requiring users to exit the system for negotiation and trade completion, leading to inefficiencies and lost opportunities, and lack options for IOI senders to control usage, including anonymous negotiations and quantity signaling.
Innovation Solution
The development of a financial-information system with integrated online negotiation mechanisms, entitlement features for IOI senders to manage recipient access and anonymity, and a 'works larger' functionality for confidential quantity signaling, enhancing trading efficiency and confidentiality.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If users exit the system to negotiate and complete trades based on IOIs, then trade negotiation can be performed, but trading efficiency deteriorates and time is lost
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges the IOI broadcasting function with the negotiation and trade completion functions into a single integrated system. The negotiation mechanism is invoked automatically within the system when an IOI is selected, eliminating the need to exit the system. This integration resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation through unified interface while improving productivity through continuous in-system negotiation capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system maintains continuous trading activity by enabling negotiation and trade completion to occur continuously within the system without requiring users to exit and re-enter. The automatic invocation of negotiation mechanisms ensures that the useful action of trade execution continues uninterrupted, resolving the time loss and efficiency deterioration caused by system exits.
2Adaptability or versatility
If conventional systems provide basic IOI broadcasting, then IOI distribution is achieved, but control options for IOI senders deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces dynamic control options for IOI senders, allowing them to configure different response options for different recipient groups. Senders can dynamically select which recipients receive which types of IOIs (general, super, or natural) and control negotiation access on a per-recipient basis. This dynamic configurability increases adaptability while the systematic organization of controls manages complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The system applies local quality by allowing differentiated treatment of different recipient groups. Each recipient or group of recipients can be assigned specific IOI types and negotiation access rights tailored to their needs. This localized customization enhances versatility for different trading scenarios while organizing control options in a manageable hierarchical structure.
3Ease of operation
If traders negotiate openly, then trade terms can be discussed, but market confidentiality deteriorates and adverse reactions increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system introduces an intermediary mechanism that enables confidential negotiation. The online negotiation mechanism acts as a controlled intermediary space where trade terms can be discussed privately between designated recipients and senders. This intermediary function maintains negotiation accessibility while protecting market confidentiality by isolating sensitive discussions from public view, thus reducing adverse market reactions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the negotiation process into controlled, private interactions between specific parties rather than public disclosures. By dividing the negotiation function into discrete, accessible-but-private channels, the system maintains ease of operation for traders while ensuring confidentiality. The segmentation allows negotiations to be conducted in isolated segments that do not expose market-sensitive information to the broader market.
Data Source
AI summary
In the financial-services industry, there are online centers that help brokers to match sellers and buyers of stock based on indications of interest (IOIs). However, at least some of these centers are not only limited in the types of IOIs that they provide, but also in the ways how they allow IOI senders to control IOI usage. Accordingly, to facilitate trades, one exemplary system provides an IOI which is associated with an online negotiation capability. Some versions of this system provide mechanisms for users, such as broker-dealers, to define different IOI response privileges for recipients of their IOIs. To reduce the market risks of failed negotiations, some versions provide automated features for comparing confidential information from traders and initiating online negotiations for stock transactions contingent on favorable comparisons.