Intraocular Lens Accommodative Response Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current intraocular lenses (IOLs) lack accommodating ability, which is essential for restoring focus after cataract surgery, and there is a need for a method to test the accommodative response of IOLs to applied forces or simulated external actuation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for testing the accommodative response of intraocular lenses by applying a force, such as a radially compressive force, and measuring the resulting deflection or change in configuration using a force effector and accommodative response measuring element, allowing for the assessment of IOL performance outside the lens capsule.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a force is applied to the intraocular lens to test accommodative response, then the lens's ability to change power can be measured, but the lens must be tested outside the lens capsule which removes it from its natural physiological environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodative response measurementVSAvoidphysiological environment integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A force effector is introduced as an intermediary device to apply controlled forces to the intraocular lens during testing. This mediator allows precise force application and measurement without requiring the lens to be implanted in the eye, enabling accommodative response measurement while maintaining testability outside the physiological environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system creates a simulated physiological environment using a force effector that replicates the forces normally applied by ciliary muscles through zonules. By copying the essential mechanical interactions rather than requiring the complete physiological system, the lens accommodative response can be measured in vitro with sufficient fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If the intraocular lens is tested outside the lens capsule, then the testing process can be simplified and performed more easily, but the lens cannot be tested in its actual implanted position where it interacts with ciliary muscles and zonules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process simplicityVSAvoidphysiological interaction simulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The force effector is designed with multi-functionality to both apply forces and measure responses. This universal device can replicate various physiological conditions (different force magnitudes, directions, and patterns) while maintaining a simple testing setup, thus achieving both ease of operation and physiological interaction simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system allows for parameter changes in the applied forces (magnitude, direction, duration) to simulate different physiological states such as accommodation at various distances. By varying these parameters, the simplified in vitro testing setup can adapt to test different aspects of lens accommodative response without requiring actual implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the lens is tested without the lens capsule and supporting structures, then the testing setup becomes less complex, but the lens cannot experience the normal forces from ciliary muscles via zonules that cause shape change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting setup complexityVSAvoidciliary muscle force application
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The complex biological mechanical system of ciliary muscles and zonules is replaced with a simplified mechanical force effector. This substitution maintains the essential force application function while dramatically reducing device complexity, allowing the lens to be tested with controlled forces without requiring the complete physiological support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The lens is extracted from the lens capsule and supporting structures for testing purposes. By taking out only the essential component (the intraocular lens) while removing the complex capsule and muscle system, the testing setup complexity is reduced while the force effector compensates for the missing force application mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the measurement and evaluation of IOL accommodative responses to forces, simulating ciliary muscle movement, thereby assessing the lens's ability to change power and accommodate, which is crucial for restoring focus and improving vision post-surgery.

Implementation Method 1

applying a force, such as a radially compressive force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

measuring the resulting deflection or change in configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8314927B2Systems and methods for testing intraocular lenses
Publication Date: 2012.11.20 ALCON INC
  • US8314927B2 patent drawing
  • US8314927B2 patent drawing
  • US8314927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and their methods of use for testing intraocular lenses outside of the lens capsule. In some embodiments the systems measure an accommodative response based on a force applied to the intraocular lens.