IOL Power Prediction Using Intraoperative Refraction Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional IOL calculators rely on pre-operative data and are prone to errors, leading to significant inaccuracies in post-operative refractive outcomes, affecting a substantial number of patients and increasing surgical costs and time.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that incorporates pre-operative and intra-operative measurements, using a determination engine to generate a predictive feature set and refine models for accurate post-operative lens settlement prediction, reducing errors to near zero.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional calculators are used for IOL power prediction, then the surgical process is simpler and faster, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates with mean error of ±0.343 D

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the prediction process into multiple independent modules: pre-operative measurement module, intra-operative measurement module, and prediction module. Each module handles specific measurement tasks (e.g., axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth) and processes data independently before integration, allowing complex predictions to be broken down into manageable components that can be developed, tested, and maintained separately while achieving higher overall accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary determination engine that acts as a mediator between raw measurement data and final IOL power predictions. This engine processes pre-operative and intra-operative measurements through multiple algorithms, reconciles data from different sources, and produces refined predictions. The intermediary layer isolates the complexity of data integration and algorithm coordination from both the measurement devices and the final decision-making process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If conventional calculators with interoperative data are used, then lens position estimation is provided, but the surgical time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens position estimation accuracyVSAvoidsurgical time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements and calculations during the pre-operative phase, capturing baseline ocular parameters (axial length, keratometry, anterior chamber depth) before surgery. This advance data collection allows the intra-operative prediction engine to work with pre-processed information, reducing the computational burden during surgery and enabling faster predictions without sacrificing accuracy. The preliminary action of data collection and initial processing eliminates the need for time-consuming measurements during the surgical procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If conventional calculators are used, then the process is simpler to operate, but the prediction error affects 5% of patients with more than 1.0 D deviation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated data collection, processing, and prediction generation. The determination engine automatically ingests pre-operative and intra-operative measurements, selects appropriate algorithms, performs calculations, and outputs IOL power recommendations without requiring manual intervention. This automation maintains ease of operation while significantly improving reliability by eliminating human calculation errors and ensuring consistent application of predictive algorithms across all cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where actual post-operative outcomes are fed back into the determination engine to continuously refine prediction algorithms. By comparing predicted versus actual refractive outcomes, the system adjusts algorithm parameters and weighting factors to improve accuracy over time. This feedback loop enhances reliability while maintaining operational simplicity, as the refinement process occurs automatically in the background without adding complexity to the user interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12502068B2Prediction of IOL power
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION INC
  • US12502068B2 patent drawing
  • US12502068B2 patent drawing
  • US12502068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are implementations of systems and methods for an improved machine learning-based system that incorporates pre-operative and intraoperative measurements captured during surgery, as well as additional patient-specific data, to provide an individualized, highly accurate post-operative manifest refraction prediction. According to some embodiments, a determination engine generates a predictive feature set of one or more predictors associated with diagnostic measurements of one or more eyes and performs a recursive selection operation using one or more combinations within the predictive feature set and one or more models to produce a most predictive subset, the most predictive subset having a highest prediction accuracy among other predictive subsets for post-operative manifest refraction. The determination engine generates a determination model by refining and retraining the one or more models of the recursive selection operation utilizing the most predictive subset.