High-Energy Ion Implanter Beam Divergence Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-energy ion implanters face challenges with beam divergence and energy spread, leading to reduced precision and increased contamination, particularly in high-energy ion implantation processes, where precise angle and depth control are critical for semiconductor device production.

Innovation Solution

A high-energy ion implanter with a U-shaped beamline configuration using electrostatic parallelizing lenses and energy filters, combined with horizontal focusing elements, to suppress beam divergence and maintain high vacuum conditions, ensuring precise ion implantation and improved productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high-energy ion implantation is performed to improve semiconductor device performance and resolution, then implantation depth and sensitivity are improved, but beam divergence and energy spread increase, reducing implantation precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation precisionVSAvoidbeam energy spread
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The beamline is divided into multiple vacuum chambers (acceleration chamber, deflection chamber, implantation chamber) separated by vacuum gates. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each section while maintaining overall vacuum integrity, enabling precise beam control despite high energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Electrostatic lenses and deflectors are introduced as intermediary elements to control and focus the ion beam. These components act as mediators between the ion source and substrate, correcting beam divergence and maintaining precise implantation angles even at high energies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If batch treatment type ion implantation is used to increase productivity, then multiple wafers are processed simultaneously, but implantation angle deviation occurs due to wafer rotation and centrifugal force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer processing throughputVSAvoidimplantation angle uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of rotating the wafers (batch treatment approach), the patent uses a stationary wafer stage with a scanning beam (single wafer approach). This inversion of the conventional approach eliminates centrifugal force effects and angle deviations while maintaining productivity through beam scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical wafer rotation system is replaced with an electrostatic beam scanning system. The electrostatic deflectors control beam position and angle without mechanical movement of the wafer, eliminating angle deviations caused by centrifugal force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If single wafer type ion implanter is used to improve implantation angle precision, then angle uniformity is improved, but beam divergence reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation angle uniformityVSAvoidwafer processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam scanning system operates continuously across the wafer surface without interruption. The electrostatic deflectors enable smooth, continuous beam movement and positioning, maintaining both precision and productivity through uninterrupted implantation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts electrostatic field parameters (voltage, polarity, magnitude) to control beam position and focus. By changing these parameters in real-time during scanning, the system maintains precise angle control while covering the entire wafer surface efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If photoresist is thickened to cover non-implantation regions in high-energy implantation, then contamination is prevented, but implantation depth control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephotoresist contamination protectionVSAvoidimplantation depth precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The photoresist layer is applied with locally optimized thickness: thicker in non-implantation regions for contamination protection, and thinner or removed in implantation regions for precise depth control. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between protection and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces beam divergence, enhances energy precision, and maintains high vacuum conditions, resulting in improved ion implantation accuracy and productivity, suitable for high-energy semiconductor applications.

Implementation Method 1

electrostatic parallelizing lens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

electrostatic final energy filter for high-energy beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deflection: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

deflection electromagnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 4

horizontal focusing element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam focusing: Focusing

Implementation Method 5

ion source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 6

mass analyzer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic separation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 7

radio frequency linear accelerator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency acceleration: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9368327B2High-energy ion implanter
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 SUMITOMO HEAVY IND ION TECH
  • US9368327B2 patent drawing
  • US9368327B2 patent drawing
  • US9368327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high-energy ion implanter includes: a beam generation unit that includes an ion source and a mass analyzer; a high-energy multi-stage linear acceleration unit that accelerates an ion beam so as to generate a high-energy ion beam; a high-energy beam deflection unit that changes the direction of the high-energy ion beam toward the wafer; and a beam transportation unit that transports the deflected high-energy ion beam to the wafer. The deflection unit is configured by a plurality of deflection electromagnets, and at least a horizontal focusing element is inserted between the plurality of deflection electromagnets.