Ion Trap Entangling Gates via Spline-Modified Laser Pulses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In ion trap quantum computers, implementing entangling gate operations with high fidelity is challenging due to practical limitations in controlling rapidly varying laser pulses, which affects the accuracy of qubit control and computation.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to compute and modify laser pulse parameters, specifically the detuning frequency and amplitude functions, by splining them to create a pulse that can be practically implemented, ensuring accurate entangling interactions between trapped ions while maintaining high fidelity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a laser pulse varies too rapidly in time to achieve accurate qubit control, then the control precision is improved, but the pulse cannot be implemented by practical lasers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit control precisionVSAvoidlaser pulse implementability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the laser pulse parameters time-dependent and adaptable. The pulse shape, frequency, and amplitude are dynamically adjusted during the entangling gate operation to achieve both high control precision and practical implementability. The pulse evolves from an idealized rapid variation to a modified version that maintains effectiveness while being manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the laser pulse (frequency, amplitude, phase, temporal shape) to resolve the contradiction. By modifying these parameters through optimization algorithms, the pulse achieves the necessary control precision while remaining within the capabilities of practical laser systems. The parameter optimization balances theoretical requirements with experimental constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the laser pulse parameters are optimized for high fidelity entangling gates, then the computational reliability is improved, but the complexity of pulse construction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational reliabilityVSAvoidpulse construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and optimizing the laser pulse parameters before the actual quantum computation. The pulse shape, frequency, and amplitude are determined in advance through optimization algorithms, allowing the experimental system to simply execute the pre-determined pulse sequence without real-time complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating an optimized model of the ideal pulse and then replicating it with practical laser systems. The theoretical optimal pulse is copied and adapted to match the capabilities of actual laser hardware, maintaining high fidelity while reducing construction complexity through iterative refinement and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modified pulse enables robust and stable entangling gate operations, reducing computational errors and increasing the reliability of quantum computations by ensuring the ions return to their initial states and minimizing laser power requirements.

Implementation Method 1

laser pulses that couple the ions to the collective motional modes of a chain of trapped ions, which arise from their Coulombic interaction between the ions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoulombic interaction: Coulomb's Law

Implementation Method 2

The ions can be cooled to near their motional ground states using such laser interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser cooling: Laser

Implementation Method 3

The ions can be optically pumped to one of the two hyperfine states with high accuracy (preparation of qubits)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical pumping: Laser

Implementation Method 4

manipulated between the two hyperfine states (single-qubit gate operations) by laser beams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRaman transition: Laser

Implementation Method 5

their internal hyperfine states detected by fluorescence upon application of a resonant laser beam (read-out of qubits)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS12056573B2Amplitude, frequency, and phase modulated entangling gates for ion trap quantum computers
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 IONQ INC
  • US12056573B2 patent drawing
  • US12056573B2 patent drawing
  • US12056573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of performing a computation using an ion trap quantum computer includes computing a detuning frequency function and an amplitude function of a laser pulse to cause entangling interaction between a pair of trapped ions of a plurality of trapped ions, each of the plurality of trapped ions having two frequency-separated states defining a qubit, splining the computed detuning frequency function of the laser pulse, modifying the computed amplitude function of the laser pulse based on the splined detuning frequency function, and applying a modified laser pulse having the splined detuning frequency function and the modified amplitude function to each trapped ion in the pair of trapped ions.