Ionic Liquid Regeneration via Free HCl Stripping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for regenerating deactivated ionic liquid catalysts in hydrocarbon conversion processes are inefficient, often resulting in incomplete conjunct polymer conversion and introducing costly regenerants or safety hazards, with many methods failing to achieve above 90% conversion and causing solids handling issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the reduction of free hydrochloric acid in deactivated ionic liquids using heat, stripping fluids, reduced pressure, or liquid-liquid extraction, followed by regeneration using known methods, reduces the need for excessive regenerants and minimizes safety risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional regeneration methods (reducing metals, hydrogenation catalysts, basic reagents) are used to remove conjunct polymer from ionic liquid, then conjunct polymer conversion is achieved, but the process introduces costly regenerants, safety hazards, and fails to achieve above 90% conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconjunct polymer conversion rateVSAvoidregeneration efficiency and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes free HCl from the ionic liquid system using a stripping fluid (water or dilute acid) before regeneration. This extraction of the harmful component (free HCl) prevents it from interfering with the regeneration process, enabling more than 90% conjunct polymer conversion without the need for excessive regenerants or hazardous reducing metals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs a preliminary action by removing free HCl through stripping before the main regeneration process. This preliminary removal of free HCl creates optimal conditions for subsequent regeneration, allowing basic reagents to work more effectively on conjunct polymer removal and achieving high conversion rates with reduced material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If excessive regenerants are used to achieve complete conjunct polymer conversion, then conversion rate improves, but material costs increase and environmental hazards increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconjunct polymer conversion rateVSAvoidenvironmental hazards and material costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of free HCl (which interferes with regeneration) into a benefit by using it as an indicator for preliminary removal. The presence of free HCl is stripped away first, creating a cleaner system for regeneration. This approach eliminates the need for excessive regenerants and reduces environmental hazards while achieving complete conjunct polymer conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of free HCl concentration by removing it through stripping before regeneration. This parameter change optimizes the regeneration conditions, allowing basic reagents to work more efficiently on conjunct polymer removal, thereby achieving high conversion rates with reduced material and environmental costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If reducing metals are used to transfer conjunct polymer to hydrocarbon phase, then regeneration is achieved, but solids handling issues and safety hazards are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregeneration processabilityVSAvoidsolids handling requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical solids handling system (reducing metals) with a chemical stripping system. Instead of using solid reducing metals that require complex handling and filtration, the patent uses a liquid stripping fluid to remove free HCl, followed by a simpler regeneration process that avoids solids handling issues entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If free HCl is not removed before regeneration, then process simplicity is maintained, but excessive regenerants are required and conversion efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stepsVSAvoidregeneration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the regeneration process into two distinct stages: (1) free HCl removal through stripping, and (2) conjunct polymer removal through regeneration. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, improving overall regeneration efficiency without significantly increasing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces the level of free HCl, allowing for improved regeneration of ionic liquid catalysts with reduced material costs and safer operations, achieving higher conjunct polymer conversion rates and minimizing environmental hazards.

Implementation Method 1

reducing a level of free hydrochloric acid in the deactivated acidic ionic liquid in a removal zone using at least one of heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

reducing a level of free hydrochloric acid in the deactivated acidic ionic liquid in a removal zone using at least one of heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

reducing a level of free hydrochloric acid in the deactivated acidic ionic liquid in a removal zone using at least one of heat, a stripping fluid, reduced pressure, and liquid-liquid extraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 4

reducing a level of free hydrochloric acid in the deactivated acidic ionic liquid in a removal zone using at least one of heat, a stripping fluid, reduced pressure, and liquid-liquid extraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepressurisation: Depressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS9566578B2Hydrochloric acid stripping process for ionic liquid regeneration process
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 UOP LLC
  • US9566578B2 patent drawing
  • US9566578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for regenerating deactivated acidic ionic liquid is described. The method involves reducing a level of free hydrochloric acid in the deactivated acidic ionic liquid in a removal zone using at least one of heat, a stripping fluid, reduced pressure, and liquid-liquid extraction to form a deactivated acidic ionic liquid having a reduced level of free hydrochloric acid; and regenerating the deactivated acidic ionic liquid having the reduced level of free hydrochloric acid.