Ionic Monopropellant Hot-Gas Generator Ignition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hot-gas-generating apparatuses for aerospace applications face challenges with ignition and stable combustion of liquid ionic propellants, especially under vacuum conditions, due to high vapor pressure and sensitivity to contaminants and temperature gradients.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of substantially anhydrous ionic solutions with very low vapor pressure, such as nitrates of ethylamine and n-propylamine, along with soluble catalysts and noble metal surface coatings on electrodes, enables efficient electrolytic decomposition and ignition with low voltage and short-duration high electric current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monopropellants like hydrazine are used, then catalytic decomposition can be achieved, but the propellants have high vapor pressure and are sensitive to contaminants and temperature gradients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestable combustionVSAvoidvapor pressure and contaminant sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental chemical parameters of the propellant by using ionic liquids instead of traditional molecular propellants like hydrazine. This parameter change results in negligible vapor pressure and reduced sensitivity to contaminants and temperature gradients, directly resolving the technical contradiction between reliable combustion and harmful vapor pressure effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite ionic liquid formulations containing multiple ionic compounds (e.g., emitters, fuels, and oxidizers) in specific ratios. This composite approach enables tailored combustion characteristics with negligible vapor pressure while maintaining stable combustion, addressing both the reliability and harmful factors contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Temperature

If electrolytic heating is used for ignition, then thermal decomposition can be achieved, but high voltage is required and operation under vacuum conditions is questionable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition temperatureVSAvoidignition voltage and energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical parameters of the ignition system by matching the electrical properties of ionic liquids (higher conductivity, lower decomposition voltage) with appropriate electrode configurations. This enables ignition at lower voltages (tens to hundreds of volts) compared to traditional systems, reducing energy consumption while achieving necessary decomposition temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adopts and adapts the electrolytic ignition concept from Breen and Russell, copying the fundamental approach of using electric current for thermal decomposition. However, it modifies the implementation by using ionic liquids with different electrical properties, enabling operation under vacuum conditions with reduced voltage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Power

If fixed electrode spacing is used, then electrolytic reaction can occur, but flashback of the flame front upstream of the injection head cannot be prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolytic reaction efficiencyVSAvoidsafety against flashback
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static fixed electrode spacing into a dynamic system where electrodes are movable relative to each other. The electrode spacing adjusts based on operational conditions, enabling the system to maintain electrolytic reaction efficiency while preventing flashback by increasing spacing when needed, thus resolving the contradiction between power and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the electrode structure into multiple independent elements that can be positioned at different locations and orientations. This segmentation allows the system to optimize electrolytic reaction zones while creating physical barriers and adjustable spacing to prevent flame front propagation upstream, addressing both power efficiency and flashback prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If porous permeable electrode materials are used, then faster ignition and more stable combustion are achieved, but the porous medium is affected by high temperatures and clogging by soot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition speed and combustion stabilityVSAvoidservice life of electrode material
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite electrode materials combining porous structures with high-temperature resistant and soot-resistant components. This composite approach maintains the ignition and combustion stability benefits of porous materials while adding resistance to thermal degradation and clogging, extending the service life of electrodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent acknowledges that porous electrode materials may have limited service life under severe conditions and designs the system to accommodate periodic replacement or regeneration of electrodes. This approach maintains high productivity during the operational life of electrodes while managing the eventual replacement need

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for reliable ignition and stable combustion of the ionic propellants under vacuum conditions, achieving specific impulse comparable to hydrazine rocket engines without performance degradation over time, and offering improved safety and handling characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

electrolytic decomposition and ignition with low voltage and short-duration high electric current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolytic decomposition: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

thermal decomposition by electrolytic heating of hydrazine in the gap between two fixed electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

catalytically active, e.g. iridium-coated, support material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

Decomposition of the hydrazine then produces temperatures of up to 1300 K

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12202778B2Hot-gas-generating apparatus with ionic monopropellant and low voltage ignition
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 LABORBITAL GMBH
  • US12202778B2 patent drawing
  • US12202778B2 patent drawing
  • US12202778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot-gas-generating apparatus for reacting a propellant comprises a combustion chamber, at least one injector that is arranged upstream of the combustion chamber and can be closed, on the combustion chamber side, to the propellant, electrodes being integrated in said injector, and at least one supply line for the propellant. In this context, the propellant is a monopropellant and a substantially water-free ionic solution having low vapor pressure, preferably with a residual water content of less than five percent by mass, which is capable of self-sustaining combustion at a given combustion chamber pressure, and the electrodes have at least two electrodes of opposite polarity which are suitable for electrically igniting the propellant by means of a flow of current through the propellant when this propellant flows between the opposite-polarity electrodes.