IoT Capability Platform for Automated Policy Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IoT management systems rely heavily on manual implementation of policies, leading to potential errors and inconsistencies in data management, particularly in organizations with disparate computing systems, which can result in system failures, security hazards, and loss of market share due to inadequate monitoring and control of IoT information.

Innovation Solution

A method for identifying, storing, searching, and combining IoT system capabilities using IoT search rules with specifications and constraints, allowing for the characterization and composition of IoT systems to ensure compliance with policies and quality control, leveraging domain-specific languages and machine learning for risk assessment and data monetization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual implementation of IoT management policies is used, then flexibility in policy adaptation is improved, but reliability and consistency of policy enforcement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in policy adaptationVSAvoidconsistency of policy enforcement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated policy enforcement where the IoT platform automatically monitors, detects, and responds to policy violations without requiring manual intervention. The automated nature ensures consistent and reliable policy enforcement while maintaining adaptability through configurable policy rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring IoT device compliance with policies and automatically generating reports on policy adherence. This feedback loop enables the system to maintain consistent enforcement while allowing for adaptive policy adjustments based on real-time compliance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated IoT system composition and assessment is implemented, then reliability and security are improved, but device complexity and system overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stability and securityVSAvoidsystem overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by providing a unified platform that handles multiple functions including device registration, capability description, policy compliance assessment, security monitoring, and data management. This multi-functional approach improves reliability across diverse IoT scenarios while managing complexity through a single integrated system rather than multiple separate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer in the form of a centralized IoT platform that mediates between diverse IoT devices and various management functions. This intermediary handles the complexity of protocol translation, capability matching, and policy enforcement, thereby improving system reliability without requiring each device to implement complex functionality locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring and assessment of IoT capabilities is performed, then data quality and information accuracy are improved, but loss of time and processing resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quality and information accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining capability descriptions, policy rules, and assessment criteria before actual monitoring occurs. Devices register their capabilities in advance using standardized templates, and compliance rules are pre-configured, enabling rapid automated assessment without time-consuming on-site evaluations and ensuring consistent, accurate data quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes processing efficiency by dynamically adjusting monitoring parameters and assessment depth based on device priorities, data sensitivity levels, and compliance requirements. This parameter adaptation allows comprehensive monitoring of critical data while reducing processing time for less critical items, maintaining data quality without unnecessary resource expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12099832B2Internet of things (IoT) capability platform
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES
  • US12099832B2 patent drawing
  • US12099832B2 patent drawing
  • US12099832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the Internet of Things refers to objects to exchange information over the Internet. An IoT system refers to one or more IoT objects that exchange information and, through those exchanges, produces information that meets an objective or purpose, including the actuation of mechanical systems. An IoT system that refers to a single IoT object may also be referred to as an IoT device. The capability of an IoT systems refers to the information produced by the system to achieve its objective or purpose. The present embodiments may be implemented by computer software on a networked digital computer or a dedicated microprocessor, connected to a digital network. The embodiments create descriptions of IoT systems and provides a means of searching over these descriptions for those satisfying search criteria and a means of composing two or more descriptions to form a description of the composition of IoT systems.