IoT Data Filtering via Privacy-Aware Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for data processing in the IoT domain are inefficient as they either send all data for remote processing or process all data locally, failing to effectively handle sensitive information, which can compromise user privacy.

Innovation Solution

A novel technique that detects and separates sensitive data from non-sensitive data, processing the sensitive portions locally while sending the non-sensitive data for remote processing, and notifies the remote system about the partial nature of the data to ensure privacy protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If all data is sent to cloud services for remote processing, then computational power and storage capacity are improved, but user privacy and data security deteriorate due to transmission of sensitive information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data into sensitive and non-sensitive portions, and segments processing into local and remote components. Local processing handles sensitive data to protect privacy, while remote processing handles non-sensitive data to utilize cloud computational power, thereby resolving the contradiction between computational power and privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts sensitive data from the overall data set and processes it locally, separating it from non-sensitive data that can be processed remotely. This extraction approach allows the system to benefit from remote processing capabilities while protecting sensitive information, resolving the contradiction between computational power and privacy risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If all data is processed locally, then user privacy is protected, but processing efficiency and resource utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data into sensitive and non-sensitive portions, processing sensitive data locally to protect privacy while sending non-sensitive data to cloud services for efficient remote processing. This segmentation resolves the contradiction between privacy protection and processing efficiency by optimizing the processing location for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different data portions: local processing with high privacy protection for sensitive data, and remote processing with high computational efficiency for non-sensitive data. This local quality approach resolves the contradiction between privacy protection and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If sensitive data is transmitted to cloud services, then remote processing capabilities are utilized, but data security and confidentiality worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote processing capabilityVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts sensitive data from the data set and processes it locally, preventing its transmission to cloud services. Only non-sensitive data is transmitted for remote processing, thereby maintaining data security while still utilizing remote processing capabilities for appropriate data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a hybrid local-remote processing approach is implemented, then privacy protection and processing efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of data into sensitive and non-sensitive portions before processing. This preliminary action simplifies the subsequent hybrid processing by clearly defining which data should be processed locally and which remotely, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining privacy protection and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10542118B2Facilitating dynamic filtering and local and/or remote processing of data based on privacy policies and/or user preferences
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 INTEL CORP
  • US10542118B2 patent drawing
  • US10542118B2 patent drawing
  • US10542118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanism is described for facilitating smart filtering and local/remote processing of data according to one embodiment. A method of embodiments, as described herein, includes detecting data collected via one or more sensing components, and evaluating the collected data to identify one or more portions of the collected data having privacy relevance, where evaluating further includes classifying the one or more portions as private data and other portions of the collected as non-private data. The method may further include filtering out the private data from the non-private data of the collected data, and processing the private data, where the non-private data is transmitted to a remote computing device over a network.