Frequency-Hopping IoT Network Collision Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing low-power wireless networks for IoT applications face challenges such as high interference resistance, regulatory compliance, and limited system load due to frequency and power collisions, especially in unlicensed bands, which restricts the capacity and efficiency of sensor node communications.

Innovation Solution

A wireless transmitter device and network utilizing modified ultra-narrowband modulation with coherent phase modulation, error-correction codes, and frequency hopping spread spectrum, along with adaptive sub-band management and implicit signalling of hopping sequences, to enhance robustness and mitigate collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If random medium access like ALOHA is used for sensor nodes, then power efficiency is improved, but collision rate increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidcollision rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency band is segmented into multiple sub-bands, and each sensor node is assigned to a specific sub-band. This segmentation reduces the probability of frequency collisions while maintaining random medium access for power efficiency. Nodes within the same sub-band can communicate without interfering with nodes in other sub-bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces frequency sub-band assignment as an additional dimension for collision avoidance. By organizing nodes into different frequency sub-bands, the system adds a frequency-dimensional separation layer to the time-random access mechanism, effectively reducing collisions in the time-frequency space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If there is no frequency grid in ultra-narrowband network, then frequency flexibility is improved, but frequency collisions double the collision rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency flexibilityVSAvoidcollision rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different sub-bands are assigned to different groups of sensor nodes based on their local requirements and characteristics. Each sub-band operates with its own frequency characteristics, allowing local optimization for specific node groups while maintaining overall system flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the frequency parameter by introducing a structured sub-band organization within the ultra-narrowband framework. This parameter change allows the system to maintain frequency flexibility while reducing random frequency collisions through organized sub-band allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If marginal sensor nodes or weak nodes participate in collisions, then network coverage is improved, but they always lose in any collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverageVSAvoidweakest nodes performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Frequency sub-band assignment acts as an intermediary mechanism that protects weak nodes from direct competition with strong nodes. By assigning weak nodes to dedicated sub-bands with reduced load, the system mediates the collision environment to favor weaker participants while maintaining overall network coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Different sub-bands are optimized for different node types, with certain sub-bands specifically allocated for weak or marginal nodes. This local quality differentiation ensures that weak nodes have dedicated resources where they can succeed, improving their performance while maintaining their contribution to network coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If phase noise of the transmitter is present, then hardware simplicity is improved, but adjacent user rejection level is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware complexityVSAvoidadjacent user rejection level
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency spectrum is segmented into multiple sub-bands separated by guard bands. This segmentation isolates adjacent users in frequency space, allowing transmitters with high phase noise to operate without interfering with adjacent users, thereby maintaining hardware simplicity while improving rejection levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the harmful effect of phase noise into a benefit by using wider sub-band allocations that can tolerate higher phase noise. Transmitters with poor frequency stability are assigned to sub-bands where their phase noise does not affect adjacent users due to the frequency separation, effectively utilizing low-cost hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly improves the robustness and capacity of low-power wireless networks by reducing interference and collisions, allowing for higher system load and efficient data transmission even with low-quality oscillators in IoT sensor nodes.

Implementation Method 1

The uplink communication from a sensor node to a gateway uses frequency hopping spread spectrum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency hopping spread spectrum:

Implementation Method 2

modified ultra-narrowband modulation with coherent phase modulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoherent phase modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentEP3591852B1Collision mitigation in low-power, frequency-hopping, wide-area network
Publication Date: 2022.01.12 SEMTECH CORP
  • EP3591852B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3591852B1 patent drawingFigure 6~9
  • EP3591852B1 patent drawingFigure 10~13

AI summary

A hopping spread-spectrum wireless network for loT applications operating in a predetermined frequency band, with mobile device that have unsynchronized local frequency references and receiving gateways that are capable of detecting whether modulated radio signals will collide in frequency in a collision time interval, and blanking the signals in the collision time. Preferably, the frequency band is subdivided into a sub-bands, and the mobile devices adapt the width of the sub-bands used for transmission based on a synchronization status indicative of the frequency error of the local frequency reference.