IoT Gateway Coordination Framework for Scalable Sensor Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In IoT systems, the existing methods for gateway-to-gateway coordination in industrial or commercial settings face challenges such as scalability, increased traffic load, and inefficiency due to ambiguous sensor ownership and lack of decentralized intelligence, leading to system instability and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a framework for gateway-to-gateway coordination that allows for centralized, cooperative, and decentralized ownership assignment of IoT sensors, using protocols like Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) standards, enabling self-organizing networks with reduced bandwidth and power consumption, and leveraging machine learning for edge analytics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If centralized coordination is used to manage gateway ownership of sensors, then system management is simplified, but communication overhead and traffic load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem managementVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

A coordinator entity is introduced as an intermediary between gateways to manage ownership assignment. The coordinator receives ownership requests from gateways, determines appropriate ownership based on coordination rules, and assigns sensors to gateways. This intermediary approach simplifies management while distributing the coordination burden, reducing the communication overhead compared to fully centralized cloud-based management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination function is segmented and distributed across multiple gateways rather than being fully centralized in the cloud. Each gateway can independently participate in ownership decisions for sensors in its vicinity, dividing the management burden and reducing the communication traffic load on centralized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If decentralized coordination is used for gateway ownership assignment, then communication overhead is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication overheadVSAvoidcoordination protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Gateways are empowered to autonomously determine and assign sensor ownership based on local conditions and coordination protocols. Each gateway can independently evaluate its own capacity and suitability for owning sensors, making self-service decisions without requiring complex centralized arbitration, thus reducing communication overhead while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If gateway ownership of sensors is not clearly defined, then sensor accessibility is improved, but system stability deteriorates due to ambiguous ownership

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accessibilityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Sensor ownership is designed as a dynamic assignment rather than a static allocation. Ownership can be reassigned based on changing system conditions, gateway capacity, and sensor requirements. The coordinator manages these dynamic assignments, ensuring that at any given time, clear ownership is established while allowing flexibility and adaptability in ownership transitions, thus maintaining both stability and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If more gateways are added to the system to improve scalability, then system capacity increases, but traffic load and coordination complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidtraffic load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

As more gateways are added to increase system capacity, the coordination function is segmented and distributed across these gateways rather than all communication passing through a single centralized point. This segmentation allows the system to scale horizontally while managing traffic load through localized coordination at each gateway level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination architecture introduces a new dimensional layer between the cloud and individual gateways. This intermediate coordination layer organizes gateways into manageable groups or regions, adding a structural dimension that allows scalable expansion without proportionally increasing the coordination burden on centralized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9860677B1Internet-of-things gateway coordination
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 INTEL CORP
  • US9860677B1 patent drawing
  • US9860677B1 patent drawing
  • US9860677B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An Internet of Things (IoT) system and method including IoT sensors to measure data and forward the data to gateway devices, the gateway devices to receive the data and provide the data to a cloud infrastructure, and a coordinator to assign ownership of the IoT sensors to the gateway devices.