Personal IoT Network Gateway Selection via Priority Ranking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing IoT networks face challenges in efficiently configuring policies and selecting gateways within personal IoT networks (PINs), which affects network performance and resource allocation.
Innovation Solution
A method and apparatus for PIN policy configuration and gateway selection, where a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) receives parameters for multiple PIN gateways, determines priorities based on PIN element types and policy parameters, and generates a prioritized list of available PIN gateways for connection requests.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If multiple PIN gateways are deployed in a personal IoT network, then network coverage and reliability are improved, but gateway selection complexity and configuration difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by introducing multiple gateway selection parameters including signal strength metrics, gateway capacity indicators, element type requirements, and policy parameters. These parameters dynamically change based on network conditions and are used to automatically determine gateway priorities, resolving the contradiction between having multiple gateways for reliability and the complexity of selecting among them.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements self-service through automated gateway selection where the WTRU independently evaluates available gateways using predefined parameters and algorithms. The gateway selection process occurs autonomously without manual configuration, with the system automatically matching elements to appropriate gateways based on their requirements and gateway capabilities, thus reducing configuration complexity while maintaining multiple gateways for reliability.
2Loss of time
If automated gateway selection is implemented, then configuration time is reduced, but computational overhead and processing requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring selection parameters, gateway capability profiles, and element type requirements before actual gateway selection occurs. These parameters are established in advance and stored for rapid retrieval during selection processes, enabling fast automated selection without extensive real-time computation, thus reducing both configuration time and computational overhead.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements local quality by tailoring gateway selection parameters and evaluation criteria to specific element types and their unique requirements. Different parameters are applied locally to different element categories (e.g., sensor types, augmented reality devices, smart plugs), allowing efficient automated selection without requiring a single complex universal algorithm, thereby reducing overall computational overhead.
3Measurement precision
If gateway selection is based on multiple parameters, then selection accuracy and network performance are improved, but processing complexity and decision-making difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the gateway selection process into distinct evaluation stages and parameter categories. Selection parameters are segmented into groups such as signal quality metrics, gateway capacity parameters, element type compatibility, and policy constraints. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate multiple parameters systematically without overwhelming complexity, improving selection accuracy while managing decision-making complexity through structured processing.
4Productivity
If PIN elements are matched with specific gateways based on requirements, then network efficiency and resource allocation are improved, but matching complexity and configuration overhead increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where gateway selection decisions are continuously evaluated based on network performance metrics and element requirements. The WTRU receives feedback about gateway performance and uses this information to refine future selections. This feedback loop enables efficient automatic matching of elements to gateways without requiring complex manual configuration, as the system learns and adapts from operational feedback to optimize matching accuracy.
Data Source
AI summary
A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) may receive parameters associated with a plurality of personal Internet of Things (IoT) network (PIN) gateways (GWs) connected to a PIN. The received parameters may comprise a PIN element type and one or more PIN policy parameters for each of the plurality of PIN GWs. The WTRU may determine a priority for each of the plurality of PIN GWs using the PIN element types and the one or more PIN policy parameters. The WTRU may generate, using the determined priorities, a prioritized list of PIN GWs available on the PIN. The WTRU may receive a connection request from a PIN element connected to the PIN. The WTRU may select one of the plurality of PIN GWs for the PIN element to use to establish connection to the core network.